The Bloomberg BNA SALT Blog is a forum for practitioners and Bloomberg BNA editors to share ideas, raise issues, and network with colleagues about state and local tax topics. The ideas presented here are those of individuals and Bloomberg BNA bears no responsibility for the appropriateness or accuracy of the communications between group members.
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
by Melissa Fernley
Since the IRS released Rev. Rul. 2013-17, which allowed married same-sex couples to file joint federal tax returns, the states have been scrambling to release their own administrative guidance. Most recently, Idaho, New Jersey, and South Carolina have issued statements outlining their policies for same-sex spouses.
Idaho's "December 2013 Tax Update", released December 20th, clarifies that because Idaho does not allow same-sex marriage, the state will also not allow same-sex spouses to file a joint state income tax return.
A South Carolina draft revenue ruling also declares that same-sex spouses must file separate returns, since same-sex marriage is not recognized in the state.
In contrast, New Jersey, which allows same-sex marriage, stated in its January 6th update to "NJ Income Tax - Filing Status" that married same-sex taxpayers are required to file joint returns.
This chart from the BBNA Same-Sex Marriage Research Page provides a comprehensive look at the states which have released administrative guidance thus far.
By Melissa Fernley
Follow us on Twitter at @BBNATax
Join BNA's State Tax Group on LinkedIn here.
to post a comment.
Corporate Close-Up: Is Rhode Island Tax Overhaul a Mixed Blessing for Corporations?
Incentives Watch: The Impact of Military Reduction and the Need for Veteran Credits
Weekly Round-Up: One Practitioner’s Fight Against Kentucky’s Revenue Department for Case Records
Extras on Excise: Washington Keeps Coffers Closed, Denies B&O Tax Refund to Health Care Providers
Property Tax Post: Processor Giant Intel Corp. Enters $100 Billion Incentive Agreement to Invest in Oregon