Environment Reporter™ keeps you fully up to date on rapidly changing developments in courts, Congress, federal agencies, state legislatures, industry, and environmental organizations.
July 17 — Most states are likely to need additional time to submit their implementation plans for meeting carbon dioxide reduction targets for existing power plants, beyond the one-year time frame outlined in President Barack Obama's climate action plan, the Environmental Protection Agency's top air official said July 17.
Janet McCabe, acting head of the agency's air office, told a breakfast hosted by ICF International that the EPA recognized that many states would have to issue additional regulations or enact legislation that might require more than a year to complete.
The agency, in its proposed rule, recognized “some states may need more than one year to complete all of the actions needed for their final state plans” so proposed an optional two-phased submittal process (79 Fed. Reg. 34,959).
Under Obama's climate action plan—detailed in a June 2013 presidential memorandum to the EPA—final rules were to be completed by June 2015, and state implementation plans would be submitted to the EPA for approval by June 30, 2016. The agency released its proposed rules (RIN 2060-AR33) June 2 under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.
Those regulations would establish unique carbon dioxide emissions rates for the power industry in each state. Carbon dioxide emissions from the existing fleet of power plants could be reduced 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 nationally at a cost of $5.4 billion to $8.8 billion in 2030.
While the agency typically limits its outreach to interested parties during the public notice and comment period, McCabe said the EPA will maintain strong outreach with utilities, environmental and public health groups, states and others as it solicits comments on the power plant proposals.
McCabe said the EPA has held “dozens” of meetings with groups since it released the proposal in June and conducted multiple calls with states to discuss the proposed rules.
“We're already hearing about the things people are wondering about or disagree with,” McCabe said. “I haven't worked on a single EPA rule—either while at EPA or before in my state career—that didn't change and improve between proposed and final as a result of robust public comment.”
The EPA is accepting public comments on its new source performance standards for existing power plants through Oct. 16.
McCabe outlined four areas of concern groups have expressed in discussions held to date:
McCabe said she is confident the agency could adequately address those concerns throughout the rulemaking process and encouraged interested parties to reach out to the agency with their opinions.
Asked whether the EPA would release a methodology or model rule that states could use in developing their plans, McCabe said the agency had no plans to do so yet.
“I wouldn't presume to say that EPA is in the best position to know what the best answer is,” McCabe said. “We want to encourage these kinds of conversations to continue.”
McCabe said during the rule's development Administrator Gina McCarthy told staff members, “If I got 50 different plans, that would be okay.”
In developing the proposed regulations, the agency envisioned states achieving the emissions reductions through four main strategies, according to McCabe.
Those strategies were ensuring power plants are operated as efficiently as possible; expanding the use of low-emitting fuel sources such as wind, solar and nuclear power; utilizing fuel sources with lower carbon emissions—like natural gas—with greater frequency; and promoting greater energy efficiency.
McCabe stressed that states could hit their emissions reduction goals through other strategies. One option would be retiring additional coal plants, but McCabe said that was not an “expectation” of the proposed regulations.
To contact the reporter on this story: Anthony Adragna in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)