Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
By Michael Greene
Feb. 27 — The Delaware Chancery Court Feb. 26 found that minority shareholders that agreed to allow a corporation to force them to vote in favor of a merger did not waive their appraisal rights when the corporation failed to exercise its drag-along rights.
Even though Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III observed that this case raised the novel question of whether common stockholders can waive their statutory right to an appraisal in the case of a squeeze out merger of a corporation, he declined to address the merits of this issue.
Instead, he found that since the corporation never demanded the shareholders vote in favor of the merger agreement, the shareholders did not waive their rights to an appraisal.
Riverstone National Inc. was acquired by Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary in an agreement approved by Riverstone's 91 percent controlling stockholder, non-party CAS Capital Ltd.
After the merger agreement was executed, Riverstone sent a letter to its minority shareholders, without notice, informing them that shares would be converted into the right to receive cash.
Subsequently, several minority shareholders filed a petition with chancery court seeking appraisal of their shares. The corporation, however, counterclaimed, seeking to specifically enforce “drag-along” rights that were agreed to as part of a stockholder agreement between the corporation and the minority stockholders.
The drag-along rights included the right to compel minority shareholders to vote in favor of certain change-in-control actions.
Vice Chancellor Glasscock found that the minority stockholders did not waiver their appraisal rights through the stockholders agreement.
Instead of an explicit waiver of appraisal rights, the parties agreed to contract for acts that would have this effect—either through a forced tender or vote in favor of a merger.
Vice Chancellor Glasscock found that these acts were entirely prospective in nature and required advanced notice, as defined by the drag-along provision.
Accordingly, he held that the company was not entitled to specific performance under the express terms of the agreement because the minority stockholders could not consent to a merger that had already been consummated.
“The Company bargained for a right it did not exercise, and not the similar right it attempted to exercise,” he wrote.
“In other words, because the Company would have gotten X had it exercised its rights does not mean the Company is entitled to result X when it failed to exercise those rights. Rather, the Company is limited to the benefit of its bargain, which according to the literal language of the Drag-Along, does not include the power to require the Minority Stockholders to consent to a transaction that has already taken place,” he added.
Vice Chancellor Glasscock also determined that Riverstone was not entitled to specific performance because of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implicit in the stockholders agreement.
The court refused to imply terms into the parties' agreement, finding that Riverstone was a sophisticated party that failed to exercise its drag-along rights, at no fault of the minority stockholders.
“Our Supreme Court has made clear that the gap-filling function of the implied covenant does not provide relief in a situation such as this, where the Company asks the court to imply a right for which it did not contract and should have foreseen,” he wrote.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Kristyn Hyland at email@example.com
The opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/MICHAEL_C_HAPLIN_AND_MICHAEL_A_CHRISTIAN_PETITIONERS_V_RIVERSTONE.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)