Media General Inc. v. FCC, et al; Tribune Co., et al v. FCC, et al.; National Association of Broadcasters v. FCC, et al, U.S., 11-691; 11-696; 11-698, 06/29/2012
The Supreme Court has declined to review broadcasters' appeals of the Federal Communications Commission's decades-old limits on ownership of broadcast stations and newspapers, placing the focus on the agency's own quadrennial media-ownership review, which is still ongoing (Media General Inc. v. FCC, et al; Tribune Co., et al v. FCC, et al.; National Association of Broadcasters v. FCC, et al, U.S., 11-691; 11-696; 11-698, 06/29/2012).
The high court denied certiorari without comment.
“We're disappointed the Supreme Court declined to review rules that limit local broadcasters' ability to compete with our national and multinational pay programming competitors,” said Dennis Wharton, executive vice president of communications for the National Association of Broadcasters, one of the entities that filed an appeal.
Wharton said the group will continue lobbying for modernization of rules that “stem from an era of 'I Love Lucy'.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld many of FCC's limits in its Prometheus Radio Project decision [53 CR 533] last July, while directing the agency to revisit its decision to ease the restriction on broadcast-newspaper cross-ownership.
As part of the commission's 2010 quadrennial media ownership review, which was supposed to be completed in 2010 but stalled as the FCC awaited the Third Circuit's decision, the agency has proposed rules that would allow one company to own a newspaper and a broadcast television station in the same market.
The FCC enacted similar rules in 2007 under Republican Chairman Kevin Martin, but the Third Circuit, in its July decision, remanded those rules because the agency did not give the public enough time to comment.
The agency had at that time allowed for 28 days, instead of the usual 90. Under the new rules proposed by Democratic Chairman Julius Genachowski, the FCC would leave in place key portions of that 2007 rulemaking, namely the elimination of the 35-year-old ban on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast TV stations.
If given final approval by the FCC, cross-ownership would be in the public interest in the 20 largest U.S. markets if a “diversity of information sources” remains and if the television station involved is not one of the four top stations in the market.
But while the FCC is proposing to lift the cross-ownership ban, it would not repeal its TV duopoly rule, which limits the number of local TV stations one company can own in a single market.
For the Supreme Court's order list from June 29, 2012:http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062912zr4f6k.pdf.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).