Skip Page Banner  
Skip Navigation

Targeting and Claim Interpretation Bundle


Product Code - LGN141
Speaker(s): Stuart S. Levy, Sughrue Mion PLLC
Add To Cart
View the Brochure
Purchase this bundle and get access to the following two programs for one low, combined price:

Targeting Your Patent Application to the Desired Technology Center or Art Unit
By using information that is publicly available, learn how to change the wording of patent claims to get your application examined in a technology center or art unit where you can obtain a patent for your client more quickly, at lower cost, and with better coverage. This knowledge is extremely desirable considering the fact that different art units and technology centers have different times to first action pendency, different allowance rates, examiners with different technological backgrounds and examiners which can be easy or difficult to deal with.

Because of the factors mentioned above, significant variances can exist in the time it takes to obtain a patent, as well as the cost to the client and the coverage obtained. Learn techniques to speed up the process and lower the cost that will be beneficial to your practice and that hopefully will result in your clients being more satisfied with the work of your firm.

Claim Interpretation Part 1: A PTO Perspective
Attendees of this program can expect to gain an understanding of how patent examiners sketch out claims and determine their scope, which is important for being successful in patent prosecution. Examiners do not search based upon a figure or figures of a drawing but rather they first sketch out the claims as an image in order to ascertain the metes and bounds, indefiniteness, and the like.

Problems arise when the examiner’s claim interpretation is different from the attorney’s or applicant’s interpretation. Attorneys then go through prosecution without being on the same page as the examiner, resulting in the attorney considering the rejection to be really bad, while the examiner and SPE think the rejection is fine. 

Stuart S. Levy, Sughrue Mion PLLC

Stuart S. Levy, Sughrue Mion PLLC
Stuart S. Levy is a retired Administrative Patent Judge with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and is now Of Counsel to Sughrue. He brings more than 40 years of experience in Ex parte proceedings relative to his tenure with the USPTO. Mr. Levy’s practice is directed to patent prosecution of high value applications, training, appeals and serving as an expert witness. He is the firm resource on matters involving USPTO practice and procedure.

Mr. Levy’s career at the USPTO included 18 years as a supervisory patent examiner and more than 7 years as an administrative patent judge. While a supervisory patent examiner, he was involved in a number of high profile projects for the PTO, including serving as Chair of the MPEP Revision Committee, where he and approximately 80 members of his committee extensively revised the MPEP over a five-year period. Mr. Levy also served as project leader for the creation of the Patent Assistance Center, for which he and his team were awarded, by the National Performance Review, Vice President Gore’s Hammer Award for helping to create a government that works better and costs less. Mr. Levy also taught and wrote materials for the USPTO Patent Academy and has served as Vice President of the Supervisory Patent Examiners and Classifiers Organization (SPECO).

Mr. Levy is an author of the Bloomberg BNA treatise Electronic and Software Patents: Law and Practice, Third Edition, with 2012 Supplement, in which he co-authored the chapter entitled “Maximizing Success in Patent Prosecution.” He prepares the materials for and teaches weekly classes at Sughrue on various aspects of USPTO practice and procedure as well as the month-long Sughrue Summer Academy.

Mr. Levy can be reached by email at slevy@sughrue.com.

These programs' CLE-credit eligibility varies by state. Bloomberg BNA is an accredited provider in the states of New York, California, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia, and most other jurisdictions grant CLE credit on a per-program basis. At this time, Bloomberg BNA does not apply directly to the states of Florida, Rhode Island, Montana and Hawaii although credit is usually available for attorneys who wish to apply individually. Additionally, the following states currently do not grant credit for Bloomberg BNA OnDemand programming: Arkansas, Ohio, Nebraska, and Delaware. Please contact the Bloomberg BNA accreditations desk if you have specific questions that have not been addressed.

If you have further questions regarding a specific state or how to file for CLE credit, please contact Bloomberg BNA customer service at 800-372-1033 and ask to speak to the CLE Accreditation Coordinator.

Hardship Policy
Bloomberg BNA offers a hardship policy for attorneys earning less than $50,000 per year. If an attorney wishes to take advantage of this option, he or she must contact Bloomberg BNA directly. For attorneys who are unemployed or earning less than $35,000 per year, a full discount off the price of the program will be awarded upon written proof of hardship. Attorneys earning between $35,000 and $50,000 per year will receive a 50% discount off the price of the program. Any attorney working in the public service sector also qualifies for a special price. If you have further questions regarding the hardship policy or seek additional information, please contact Bloomberg BNA customer service at 800-372-1033 and ask to speak to the CLE Accreditations Coordinator, or email us at accreditations@bna.com.

Questions
For more information about Mandatory or Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) requirements, visit the American Bar Association website at http://www.abanet.org/cle/mandatory.html.