Medical Expenses Should be Deductible by All - Then Tax Issues
Won’t Cause Reform to Fall
By Gerald S. Deutsch, Esq.
Glen Head, NY
The medical program in our country needs fixing, if for no other
reason than that a large number of unemployed people have lost - or
when their “COBRA” runs out - will lose medical insurance
for themselves and their families.
There seems to be opposition to almost every aspect of proposals
advanced, some of them worthy of further discussion. But one proposal
- to tax medical benefits afforded employees to help finance a new
program - drew outrage.
But let's look at this for a moment. If benefits are taxable, won't
they be deductible as medical expenses? Yes, but: (1) only if the
taxpayer itemizes deductions; (2) for regular tax purposes, only to
the extent that these expenses exceed 7 1/2% of adjusted gross income
(AGI); (3) for alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes, only to the
extent they exceed 10% of AGI.
This problem was solved for self-employed persons, partners and 2%
or more stockholders in S corporations who are taxed on medical
benefits afforded them by their entities. Section 162(l) allows such
amounts to be deducted as “self employed health insurance”
on page one of the 1040 before arriving at AGI. Thus, the standard
deduction may also be claimed.
This puts self employed persons, partners and 2% S corporation
shareholders in the same position as employees who are not taxed on
their benefits. Partners and 2% S shareholders are taxed, but they get
a deduction equal to the amount of the income. (And their partnership
or S corporation - like a C corporation - gets a deduction.)
But the rules are so complex and they create distinctions without
differences. Consider a fairly recent IRS Notice - Notice 2008-1,
2008-2 I.R.B. 251, issued in December of 2007, which discusses
§162(l) and shows in its examples why some distinctions make
little sense.
In Example 3, a shareholder obtains an accident and health
insurance policy in his own name. The S corporation makes all the
premium payments to the insurance company. The S corporation reports
the amount of the premiums as wages on the shareholder's Form W-2, and
the shareholder reports that amount as gross income on Form 1040. A
plan providing medical care for the shareholder has been established
by the S corporation and the shareholder is allowed the deduction
under §162(l). But in Example 1, a shareholder obtains an
accident and health insurance policy on his own and he makes the
premium payments on the policy. The S corporation makes no payments or
reimbursements with respect to the premiums. A plan providing medical
care for the shareholder is not established by the S
corporation. The shareholder is not entitled to the deduction under
§162(l). This shareholder must be subject to the restrictions of
§213.
(But note that according to CCA 200524001, a self-employed
individual/sole proprietor may deduct medical care insurance costs for
himself and his family from earned income of his trade or business
when a health insurance policy purchased by the sole proprietor is
issued in his individual name and not in name of sole proprietor's
trade or business.”)
So if the law is changed to tax corporate employees, then partners
and 2% S corporation shareholders will be in a better position - which
is almost unheard of! Unless, of course, §162(l) is to be
repealed. A step backwards and surely against small business.
That leaves only those who pay for their own insurance subject to
the harsher rules of §213 and the restrictions in being able to
deduct medical expenses as noted above. Why? Aren't these the people
we want to help encourage to purchase medical insurance? Aren't these
the people who generally claim the standard deduction?
So why not allow all medical expenses that are (i) paid for by the
taxpayer or (ii) are considered taxable income to the taxpayer to be
allowed as a deduction in full in determining AGI? Why not allow all
taxpayers to be treated the same way? Again, why not encourage those
not covered by employers' insurance to obtain their own insurance
coverage?
For more information, in the Tax Management Portfolios, see
Maule, 503 T.M., Deductions: Overview and Conceptual Aspects,
and Kenty, 389 T.M., Medical Plans -- COBRA, HIPAA, HRAs, HSAs
and Disability,and in Tax Practice Series, see ¶2840, Medical
Expenses.
|