Transfer Tax Payment and Apportionment is a study of the law concerning the payment and apportionment of federal and state wealth transfer taxes. This Portfolio, written by Jeffrey N. Pennell, Emory University School of Law, and Robert T. Danforth, Washington and Lee University School of Law, discusses both federal and state law and examines the interplay of those rules with the tax payment provisions contained in wills and other estate planning instruments.
This Portfolio is designed principally for estate planners, for trust and estate fiduciaries and their counsel, and for lawyers and other professionals involved in both tax and nontax litigation concerning apportionment matters.
Estate planners often overlook transfer tax apportionment issues, relying either on the default rules of state and federal law or on boilerplate tax payment provisions contained in will and trust forms. For several reasons, uncritical reliance often is misplaced. First, in large estates, more property may pass under the tax payment provision of a will or trust than under all of the other provisions combined. Thus, crafting an appropriate tax payment provision is at least as important as the other dispositive elements of a sophisticated estate plan. Second, the prevalence of various nonprobate property interests (such as jointly held property, revocable inter vivos trusts, and employee benefit plans) means that a substantial portion of the gross estate is not subject to estate administration; failing to apportion taxes to substantial nonprobate assets that generate a portion of the tax bill may bankrupt the probate estate. Third, tax apportionment affects both the relative shares received by estate beneficiaries and, under certain circumstances, the amount of the aggregate tax liability; failing to apportion taxes properly may subject the estate to a larger than necessary wealth transfer tax burden. Transfer Tax Payment and Apportionment is designed to give planners the tools needed to address these questions with greater care and clarity.
Tax apportionment issues also are profoundly important to fiduciaries. Failing to understand and to implement an apportionment scheme may constitute a breach of fiduciary duty (for example, if a personal representative fails to collect taxes from nonprobate beneficiaries, thus potentially harming probate beneficiaries). A failure to consider apportionment questions also may subject the fiduciary to personal liability to the government (for example, if the fiduciary distributes estate assets based on tax miscalculations, by failing to reduce a marital bequest by taxes properly charged thereto) or to beneficiaries (including nonprobate beneficiaries to whom a portion of the tax liability is apportioned) who are affected by the fiduciary's tax administration. A general misunderstanding of the law in this area and the failure to address apportionment issues properly has spawned litigation in both state and federal courts; indeed, tax payment questions probably constitute the single greatest source of estate planning and administration malpractice in terms of matters litigated. This Portfolio provides an exposition of existing apportionment law as well as the authors’ views relating to interpretative questions on which legal guidance is inadequate.
Transfer Tax Payment and Apportionment allows you to benefit from:
This Portfolio is part of the Estates, Gifts and Trusts Portfolios Library, a comprehensive series containing more than 80 Portfolios, which covers critical transactions in estate, gifts and trusts planning. This highly-regarded resource library offers commentary on a wide range of estate planning topics including: Generation Skipping Tax, Family Limited Partnerships, Charitable Remainder Trusts, Estate Planning for Closely-Held Businesses, Exempt Organizations and Private Foundations, Life Insurance, Valuation, and more.
Detailed Analysis
I. Introduction
A. Scope of Portfolio
B. Importance of Topic
1. In General
2. Affects Amounts Received by Beneficiaries
3. Affects Aggregate Tax Liability
a. Charitable and Marital Dispositions
b. Generation-Skipping Dispositions
c. Dispositions Triggering State Inheritance Taxes
4. Fiduciary Liability Concerns
5. Collection of Taxes
C. Apportionment Options and Terminology
2. Inside Apportionment
3. Outside Apportionment
4. Equitable Apportionment
5. Apportionment Among Multiple Entities
6. Apportionment of Credits
7. Apportionment of Rate Differentials
8. Apportionment to Temporal Interests
II. Federal Apportionment Rules
Introductory Material
A. Section 2002
B. Section 2205
C. Estate Tax Reimbursement Provisions - Sections 2206 Through 2207B
2. Section 2206
3. Section 2207
4. Section 2207A
5. Section 2207B
6. Absence of Comparable Rules for Other Nonprobate Assets
D. GST Tax Apportionment Rule - Section 2603(b)
E. QDOT Tax Payment Rule - Section 2056A(b)
III. State Apportionment Rules
A. Introduction: Silence Generates What Result?
B. Overview of State Approaches
C. Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act
1. Introduction
2. Substantive Rules
3. Enforcement Rules
D. State Law Approaches to Specific Tax Apportionment Concerns
1. Equitable Apportionment
2. Apportionment of Inheritance Taxes
3. Apportionment of Fees and Expenses
4. Apportionment of Interest and Penalties
5. Apportionment of Credits
6. Apportionment to Nonprobate Assets
7. Apportionment to Temporal Interests
8. Elective Share Computations
9. Apportionment of Sections 2032A and 2057 Recapture Taxes
10. Conflicting Documents
11. Apportionment to Adjusted Taxable Gifts
12. Apportionment to Phantom Assets
E. Conflict of Laws Concerns
IV. Planning and Drafting for Tax Apportionment
A. Overriding State and Federal Default Rules
2. Interpretative Issues
3. Conflicting Documents
B. Miscellaneous Planning Concerns
1. Waiving Federal Reimbursement Rights
2. Liquidity Concerns Associated With Federal Reimbursement Rules
3. Gift Tax Concerns Associated With Federal Reimbursement Provisions
4. Choosing Pro Rata or Incremental Apportionment
5. Apportionment Concerns Associated With Employee Benefit Plans
6. Administrative Concerns/Order of Payment
7. Using Tax Apportionment to Minimize Spouse's Elective Share
8. Disclaimers and Partial QTIP Elections
9. Section 2035(b) and Other Phantom Assets
10. Apportionment of Credits and Rate Differentials
11. GST Tax Apportionment Concerns
12. Coordination With Section 303 Redemptions
13. Apportionment to Nonprobate Assets
14. Apportionment of Recapture Taxes
15. Apportionment to Temporal Interests
C. Checklist of Planning Choices
V. Liability for Taxes
Working Papers
Table of Worksheets
Worksheet 1 State-by-State Summary of Default Apportionment Rules
Worksheet 2 Sample Tax Clauses for Wills and Revocable Trusts
Worksheet 3 Revised Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act (1964)
Worksheet 3A Revised Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act (2003)
Worksheet 4 Texas Probate Code § 322A
Worksheet 5 California Probate Code, Division 10. Proration of Taxes
Bibliography
OFFICIAL
Internal Revenue Code:
Revenue Rulings:
Cases:
UNOFFICIAL
Selected Periodicals:
1942
1948
1950
1951
1952
1955
1957
1958
1959
1960
1966
1967
1971
1973
1975
1976
1979
1980
1981
1982
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2004
2005
2006
2007