By Ali Qassim
April 17 --The cybersecurity scheme the U.K. government plans to launch this summer shares some similarities with the U.S. government's critical infrastructure cybersecurity framework, including being voluntary and aimed at all organizations, regardless of size or sector, Nigel Montgomery, a partner at Sidley Austin LLP in London told Bloomberg BNA April 17.
But there are some differences between the U.S. and U.K. cybersecurity frameworks, including the use of their different tiered-implementation structures and the possibility that the U.K. plan will become mandatory for government procurement purposes, Montgomery said.
The U.S. framework was rolled out by the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology in February.
The proposed U.K. Cyber Essentials Scheme (CES) was released April 7 by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Public comments on the scheme are due May 7.
The U.K. government hopes its scheme will “become an influential benchmark for basic cyber hygiene in the U.K., and certainly there is a feeling that lack of confidence in security is causing business to be reluctant to adopt new technology, particularly in cloud computing,” Montgomery said.
“Participation in the CES is intended to demonstrate to customers, partners and stakeholders that a business takes information security seriously,” he said.
The CES includes an Assurance Framework aimed at businesses that want to demonstrate compliance through an independent certification system, Montgomery said.
The CES and its assurance framework are the latest steps in the U.K. government's cybersecurity strategy--published in November 2011, he said.
The CES focuses on five critical technical controls that organizations aren't adequately applying, so as to leave them vulnerable to cyber threats:
• Boundary firewalls and Internet gateways: to protect against attacks based on capabilities and techniques that are freely available on the Internet--by restricting inbound and outbound network traffic to authorized connections;
• Secure configuration: to reduce the level of inherent vulnerabilities and provide only the services required to fulfil their role;
• User access control: to ensure that special access privileges are assigned only to authorized individuals;
• Malware protection:to monitor for, detect and disable malicious software; and
• Patch management:to identify that software running on computers and network devices is kept up-to-date.
In addition to both being voluntary, the U.S. and U.K. cybersecurity frameworks aren't intended to replace existing cybersecurity practices but to supplement them in a way that works best for each company's particular circumstances, Montgomery said.
Although both schemes share a tiered-implementation structure, there are also differences in the use of these tiers, he said. Under the U.K. scheme, an organization may achieve bronze, silver or gold tier status depending on the level of independent certification of its cybersecurity readiness. The NIST framework includes four tiers--partial, risk informed, repeatable and adaptive--which indicate the extent to which a business meets the framework requirements, Montgomery noted.
The U.K. intends to use its scheme in the context of government procurement, whereas the U.S. government had repeatedly said the framework won't be made mandatory, he said. “That being said, cybersecurity is a significant area of contractual requirements in the defense industrial base, and the NIST-based requirements may well become mandatory in certain areas or form the basis for state negligence standards,” Montgomery said.
He also noted that in the U.S., multiple federal agencies--such as the Securities and Exchange Commission--as well as the state California, are issuing cybersecurity guidance that, although not mandatory, strongly influences what companies should do to strengthen their data safeguards, he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Ali Qassim in London at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Donald G. Aplin at email@example.com
Further information on the U.K. Cyber Essentials Scheme--including the Cyber Essentials Scheme summary, the Cyber Essentials Scheme requirements for basic technical protection from cyber attacks, the Cyber Essentials Scheme proposed assurance framework and the Cyber Essentials Scheme proposed assurance framework response form is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cyber-essentials-scheme-overview.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).