Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
June 3 — An at-will employee for a real estate firm in Virginia who was fired without notice can’t proceed with her breach of implied contract claim, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled ( Johnston v. William E. Wood & Assocs. , 2016 BL 175129, Va., No. 151160, 6/2/16 ).
One hundred years ago, the Virginia high court held that when a contract is silent as to its duration, “either party is ordinarily at liberty to terminate it at-will on giving reasonable notice of his intention to do so,” Justice Stephen R. McCullough wrote for the court.
Rejecting Brenda Johnston’s claim against William E. Wood & Associates Inc., the court said “reasonable notice” doesn’t mean “advance notice.” It just means “effective notice” that the employment relationship has ended, the court held in a June 2 opinion.
The ruling resolves a split among state circuit courts and federal district courts as to whether “reasonable notice” has a temporal component, attorneys told Bloomberg BNA June 3.
“The court clarified an ambiguous aspect of the law in terms of what reasonable notice means,” the employer's attorney, Brian Muse of LeClairRyan in Williamsburg, Va., told Bloomberg BNA.
“The opinion is helpful for employers because it recognizes that at-will is a cornerstone of Virginia law,” Karen Elliott of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott in Richmond, Va., said. Elliott authored an amicus brief on behalf of several employer groups.
“It is also helpful to employees because it clarifies that they aren't obligated to give advance notice to their employer before resigning,” Elliott said.
But the at-will doctrine can be “economically brutal” for an employee who loses her job without notice, Johnston's attorney, Jeramiah Denton, told Bloomberg BNA.
“Every once in a while there is an opportunity to lessen the burden of the at-will doctrine,” Denton said. “But the court elected not to do that here.”
Johnston worked for William E. Wood & Associates for 17 years, according to the court.
The company terminated her employment without advance notice, and she filed a lawsuit claiming wrongful discharge and breach of an implied contract term.
Johnston argued that her employer should have provided reasonable advance notice of termination. But the court disagreed.
“Imposing a requirement of reasonable advance notice is antithetical to the flexibility that lies at the heart of the at-will doctrine and would undermine the indefinite duration element of at-will employment,” the court said. It said a contrary ruling would create uncertainty for both employers and employees.
The court noted that a “reasonable advanced notice” rule would mean employers could sue workers who don't provide sufficient notice of leaving. This could discourage employees from seeking better jobs elsewhere, it said.
“Every decision to terminate an employment relationship, or of an employee to quit a job, would become a jury question—hardly the clear, flexible rule that the at-will doctrine contemplates,” the court said.
In light of the ruling, employers should review their handbooks and make sure they don't impose a temporal requirement, like two-weeks' notice, on employees who resign, Elliott told Bloomberg BNA.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lisa Nagele-Piazza in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at email@example.com
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Johnston_v_William_E_Wood__Assocs_No_151160_2016_BL_175129_Va_Jun.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)