|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Chemical Plant Security
February 2005
BNA's Web Watch is prepared by Laura
Gordon-Murnane. E-mail suggestions for future weekly topics
always welcome.
Federal Government
Congressional Testimony
U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs - The
Department of Homeland Security: The Road Ahead Date: 1/26/05
Member Statements
Senator
Susan M. Collins
Senator
Joseph I. Lieberman
Witnesses Testimony
Panel 1
Richard
L. Skinner, Acting Inspector General , Department of Homeland
Security
James
Jay Carafano, PH.D. , Senior Fellow , The Heritage Foundation
Michael
Wermuth, Senior Policy Analyst , RAND Corporation
Stephen
Flynn, Senior Fellow for National Security Studies , Council
on Foreign Relations
Richard
Falkenrath, PH.D. , Visiting Fellow,
Foreigh Policy Studies , The Brookings Institute
Committee on Government Reform - Subcommittee - Subcommittee
on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations
Hearing
Advisory - Homeland Security: Monitoring Nuclear Power Plant
Security
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
September 14, 2004 Briefing
Memo Opening Statement
Opening Statement of Chairman Shays
Witness Testimony
Testimony
of Luis A. Reyes, Executive Director of Operations, Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Testimony
of Jim Wells, Director, Natural Resources and Environment, Government
Accountability Office
Testimony
of Alex Matthiessen, Director, Hudson Riverkeeper, Garrison, New
York
Testimony
of David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, D.C.
Testimony
of Marvin Fertel, Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Nuclear
Energy Institute, Washington, D.C.
Charles Schumer
New Schumer Homeland Security
Report Card: 3
Years Later, Feds' Efforts Still Leave New York Dangerously Unprotected,” (Sept.
12, 2004)
U.S. Government Accountability Office
Homeland Security:
Federal Action Needed to Address Security Challenges at Chemical
Facilities (Feb. 23, 2004)
Department of Homeland Security
DHS National
Response Plan including
all annexes, "Emergency
Support Function Annexes", "Support
Annexes", and "Incident Annexes
Department of Homeland Security
National
Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures
and Key Assets (February 2003)
Independent Agencies Environmental Protection Agency
EPA,
Chemical Accident Risks in U.S. Industry – A Preliminary
Analysis of Accident Risk Data from U.S. Hazardous Chemical Facilities,
Washington, D.C.: (September 25, 2000)
National Academies of Science
National Security
and Homeland Defense: Challenges for the Chemical Sciences in
the 21st Century
Tracking
and Predicting the Atmospheric Dispersion of Hazardous Material
Releases: Implications for Homeland Security Committee
on the Atmospheric Dispersion of Hazardous Material Releases, National
Research Council
Nongovernment Organizations
American Chemistry Council
Transportation
Security Guidelines for the US Chemical Industry (August 2002)
Guide
to Site Security in the US Chemical Industry (October 2001)
PennEnvironment
Needless
Risk: Oil Refineries and
Hazard Reduction showed that 34 facilities put more than 100,000
people at risk in Pennsylvania alone.
Public Citizen
Homeland UnSecured: The Bush Administration's
Hostility to Regulation and Ties to Industry Leave America Vulnerable
|