Wells Fargo's $82M Refund Claim Denied for Lacking Economic Substance

For over 50 years, Bloomberg BNA’s renowned flagship daily news service, Daily Tax Report® has helped leading practitioners and policymakers stay on the cutting edge of taxation and...

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Aug. 22 affirmed the denial of an $82 million tax refund to WFC Holdings Corp., the parent company of Wells Fargo Bank N.A., because the underlying transaction lacked both economic substance and a non-tax business purpose (WFC Holdings Corp. v. United States, 8th Cir., No. 11-03616, 8/22/13).
In affirming a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, the court held that WFC was not entitled to a tax refund for a capital loss it claimed as a result of a complex transaction involving the transfer of underwater leases and the sale of stock (193 DTR K-1, 10/5/11).
In 1996, Wells Fargo & Co., WFC's predecessor, acquired First Interstate Bancorp, with which it had overlapping geographical footprints. WFC ended up with a large number of leased properties that it did not need. Many of those leases were for amounts greater than amounts for which WFC could sublease the properties.

For full access to this article, please register for a free trial to Daily Tax Report®.