Whistleblowing and Retaliatory Discharge: Significant Developments in 2011

ARLINGTON, Va. (November 2, 2011)—U.S. courts have been busy this year sorting out how employers have responded to whistleblowing employees and under what circumstances employers handled retaliation claims. The decisions reached offer employers a roadmap for avoiding the numerous potholes and roadblocks that can become costly setbacks.

An important U.S. Supreme Court case this year that expanded retaliation claims: Thompson v. North American Stainless (January 24, 2011), in which the terminated fiancé of a female employee successfully filed an EEOC charge as an “aggrieved person.”  The decision breaks new ground as to who may pursue a Title VII claim.

Join Daniel Westman, Partner, Morrisson Foerster and Richard Moberly, Associate Dean for Faculty and Associate Professor of Law at the University Of Nebraska College Of Law on November 16, 2011 for Whistleblowing and Retaliatory Discharge: Significant Developments in 2011, a discussion of these retaliation claims under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act:

• Kasten v. Saint Gobain (March 22, 2011):  Employees who make verbal complaints about wage/hour violations within their employers’ organizations are protected under the Fair Labor Standards Act
• Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp., ARB No. 1-050, ALJ No. 2008-SOX-00049 (ARB Feb. 28, 2011):  Shareholder fraud not a required element of a SOX whistleblower claim
• Johnson v. Siemens Building Technologies, ARB No. 08-032, ALJ No. 2005-SOX-015 (ARB March 31 2011):  Privately held subsidiaries of publicly traded parent corporations are covered by SOX whistleblower provisions
• Sylvester v. Paraxel Int’l LLC, ARB No. 07-123, ALJ No. 2007-SOX-039 (ARB May 25, 2011):  Rejecting standard that “an employee’s protected communications must relate ‘definitively and specifically’ to the subject matter of the particular statute under which protection is afforded
• Funke v. Federal Express, ARB No. 09-004, ALJ No. 2007 SOX-043 (ARB July 8, 2011):  Disclosures about violations that employees reasonably believe are about to be committed are protected
• Menendez v. Halliburton, Inc., ARB No. 09-002, 09-003, ALJ No. 2007-SOX-00005 (ARB Sept. 13, 2011):  Breaching confidentiality of employee who submitted complaint to Audit Committee constitutes a violation of SOX whistleblower provisions
• Vannoy v. Celanese Corporation, ARB No. 09-118, ALJ No. 2008-SOX-00064 (ARB Sept. 28, 2011):  Employee’s complaints about “misstated financial records and shortcomings in accounting controls” were protected conduct under the SOX
• The new SEC regulations for the anonymous whistleblower bounty provisions of Dodd-Frank

Attendees to this webinar will also receive 1.0 CPE or 1.5 HRCI credits. Can’t attend? Purchase a recording. Go to http://www.bna.com/Whistleblowing-Retaliatory-Discharge-18041/?utm_source=newswire&utm_medium=PR&utm_content=HR&utm_campaign=HR%2BWeb 

About the Speakers:
Daniel Westman, Morrisson Foerster is Managing Partner for the Northern Virginia Office. He represents clients in jury trials, preliminary injunction hearings, arbitrations, and mediations. Mr. Westman's practice focuses on litigating employee mobility, trade secret, non-competition, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, whistleblower, and retaliatory discharge cases.

Richard Moberly is Associate Dean for Faculty and an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law.  Professor Moberly has published numerous articles on whistleblowing and retaliation, including an empirical study of Sarbanes-Oxley claims published in the William & Mary Law Review and an analysis of the Supreme Court's approach to retaliation cases, which was published recently in the Case Western Reserve Law Review.  He also has testified before the United States House of Representatives on whistleblower protection in the U.S. and spoken internationally on whether corporate codes of ethics provide protection to whistleblowers. Professor Moberly graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School and served as an editor of the Harvard Law Review.

To register for this webinar and obtain further information about CPE or HRCI credits, go to http://www.bna.com/Whistleblowing-Retaliatory-Discharge-18041/?utm_source=newswire&utm_medium=PR&utm_content=HR&utm_campaign=HR%2BWeb  or call 1.800.372.1033, Option 6, then Option 1.

To receive automatic email notification of upcoming BNA webinars, go to: http://www.bna.com/emailsignup.htm 

About BNA HR and Payroll Webinars 

BNA’s HR & Payroll webinars are designed especially for today's busy professional. In just 90 minutes, you have access to in-depth coverage of an ever-changing array of current topics including breaking news, new and revised regulations, and the latest trends and developments in human resources, payroll, and international HR. Presented by top speakers, you’ll learn more about how to handle the newest challenges for your organization. Our renowned webinar series provides you with a cost-effective and convenient way to bring learning, training, and professional development to every member of your department. HRCI and APA RCH Credits available!  

Source BNA HR & Payroll

Press Contact:
Matt Sottong
703.341.3811
msottong@bna.com