Energy and Climate Report provides current, thorough coverage of clean energy, efficiency, and climate change legislation, regulation, policy, legal developments, and trends in the U.S. and...
Dec. 18 — Federal agencies should consider the climate impact of any action that would increase greenhouse gas emissions by the equivalent of 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually, the White House Council on Environmental Quality said in updated draft guidance.
The draft guidance released Dec. 18 outlines how agencies should consider the impact of federal projects on climate change during reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act. The latest draft updates similar draft guidance issued by the Council on Environmental Quality in 2010.
The draft guidance said evaluations of climate change impacts with less than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent annually don't warrant evaluation unless the analysis is “easily accomplished.” Additionally, the draft guidance directs federal agencies to focus on climate-resilient alternatives when evaluating projects.
CEQ oversees federal agency compliance with NEPA, which requires federal agencies to analyze the environmental impact of their actions, such as decisions on oil and gas leasing, dam building and public works projects and timber sales on federal lands.
“This is a big step forward,” Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) said in a Dec. 18 statement. “Agency heads and the public will now be informed about the climate consequences of federal decisions. This is another milestone in implementing the President's Climate Action Plan.”
The Council on Environmental Quality said it “does not expect” that greenhouse gas emissions alone would trigger an environmental impact statement for a project. Though no single project will have a significant impact on climate change individually, the guidance said that isn't an excuse not to consider greenhouse gas emissions during a NEPA review.
“Therefore, the statement that emissions from a government action or approval represent only a small fraction of global emissions is more a statement about the nature of the climate change challenge, and is not an appropriate basis for deciding whether to consider climate impacts under NEPA,” the guidance said.
In addition to emissions, the draft guidance directs federal agencies to also consider the greenhouse gas sequestration potential of the project's location. That includes the emissions and sequestration impact of land management practices such as controlled burning, timber stand improvements, harvesting and livestock grazing.
“Notably, the net effect of these agency actions resulting in biogenic emissions may lead to reductions of GHG concentrations through increases in carbon stocks or reduced risks of future emissions,” the draft guidance said.
As federal agencies consider project alternatives, that analysis should include greenhouse gas mitigation alternatives such as use of renewable energy, habitat restoration, sustainable land management practices and capturing fugitive methane emissions.
The Council on Environmental Quality first issued the draft guidance in February 2010. That guidance also directed federal agencies to analyze the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from federal actions that increase emissions by 25,000 tons per year or more of carbon dioxide-equivalent.
The Council on Environmental Quality will accept comments on the updated draft guidance for 60 days.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Childers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)