Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
April 3 — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined April 3 to rehear its controversial Newman decision absolving two former hedge fund portfolio managers of criminal insider trading liability.
The ruling means that in the Second Circuit, prosecutors must show that an insider trading defendant knew that the source of the information received a personal benefit for disclosing it.
In declining without elaboration to reconsider its opinion, the court said both the panel that decided the appeal and the entire court sitting en banc considered—and rejected—the government's bid for rehearing.
Hailing the move, New York lawyer Gregory Morvillo, counsel to defendant Anthony Chiasson, said the Second Circuit's decision “powerfully reaffirms” his client's innocence.
He told Bloomberg BNA in an e-mail: “This victory is proof that the justice system worked how it is supposed to, with thoughtful judicial oversight when there are glaring errors at the trial court level.”
Through a spokesperson, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara declined to comment.
In December, in a major blow to federal prosecutors, the appeals court threw out the convictions of Chiasson and his co-defendant Todd Newman for trading on inside information about two technology companies. It ruled that the government didn't prove that the two men—both downstream tippees—knew that the information was disclosed by an insider in exchange for a personal benefit.
The court also ruled that the government may not “prove the receipt of a personal benefit by the mere fact of a friendship, particularly of a casual or social nature.” Rather, there must be “at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature.”
In January, backed by the Securities and Exchange Commission as amicus curiae, Bharara focused on the panel's “new and incorrect” definition of personal benefit in asking the Second Circuit to rehear the decision.
The SEC didn't respond immediately to a request for comment. Earlier this year, however, Enforcement Director Andrew Ceresney said the Newman decision won't stop the commission from bringing insider trading cases. At a lawyers' gathering, he said that while the opinion is significant, the agency still can bring other cases in other circuits and in administrative proceedings.
Nonetheless, the decision already has affected a number of pending cases. In January, for example, Bharara asked the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York to dismiss his case against five men who allegedly traded on inside information about IBM Corp.'s 2009 acquisition of software concern SPSS Inc. He told the court that the government wasn't able to meet the “novel evidentiary bar” created by Newman.
Meanwhile, several lawmakers have sought to limit the impact of the decision by offering bills specifically to define insider trading.
Bharara still could seek U.S. Supreme Court review of the controversy. The move is risky, however, inasmuch as a high court ruling contrary to the government's position wouldn't be limited to the Second Circuit.
To contact the reporter on this story: Phyllis Diamond in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan Jenkins at email@example.com
The summary order is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/United_States_of_America_v_Newman_Docket_No_1301837_2d_Cir_May_10/7.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)