Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
Dec. 17 — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Dec. 17 affirmed the dismissal of a shareholder derivative action on the basis of issue preclusion because it was filed after four separate shareholders filed separate derivative lawsuits that were subsequently consolidated and dismissed for failure to sufficiently argue demand futility.
Addressing a novel issue under Nevada law—“whether shareholders in derivative suits are in privity for the purposes of issue preclusion”—Judge Consuelo Callahan agreed with other courts that “derivative stockholders are in privity with each other because they act on behalf of the defendant corporation.”
The appeals court recounted that defendant International Game Technology is a Nevada corporation that makes electronic gaming systems. Shareholder plaintiff Lawrence Arduini argued that certain IGT officers made intentionally misleading statements about the company's financial prospects and that the IGT board failed to adequately oversee the officers. In April 2011, Arduini filed a shareholder derivative complaint without making a pre-suit demand on the IGT board, instead alleging that a demand would have been futile.
Before Arduini filed suit, however, the lower court dismissed a similar consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit —the Fosbre lawsuit—for insufficient demand futility allegations and the appeals court affirmed the dismissal. As for Arduini's complaint, the lower court granted IGT's dismissal bid, finding that the doctrine of issue preclusion prohibited relitigating the issue of demand futility. Arduini promptly appealed.
Arduini first argued that issue preclusion does not apply because he has asserted new allegations regarding demand futility that were not in the Fosbre complaint. He also added that issue preclusion does not apply because he was not “in privity” with the Fosbre plaintiffs because they failed to establish derivative standing and to adequately represent IGT and its stockholders. The appeals court disagreed.
Under Nevada law, the appeals court opined, “the underlying demand futility allegations need not be identical before issue preclusion applies.” Rather, the question is “whether the ‘same ultimate issue' was decided in the prior case.” Clarifying that the matter in dispute in both Arduini's case and the Fosbre case is simply whether demand should be excused, the appeals court held that Arduini's offer of additional allegations does not change the issue under Nevada law.
The appeals court also held that shareholders in derivative lawsuits are in privity for the purposes of issue preclusion. It clarified that parties in separate derivative lawsuits, even if they are represented by different shareholders, are the same because the corporation is the “‘sole real party in interest in both cases.'” Adopting other courts' reasoning, it held that where the shareholders are acting on behalf of the corporation and its shareholders, the underlying issue of demand futility is the same “regardless of which shareholder brings suit.”
The opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Lawrence_Arduini_v_IGT_Docket_No_1215750_9th_Cir_Apr_04_2012_Cour.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)