Rely on Occupational Safety & Health ReporterSM for full news coverage and documentation of federal and state workplace safety and health programs, standards, legislation,...
By Stephen Lee
June 30 — Federal agencies are issuing fewer advance notices of proposed rulemaking, new research shows.
Since 2005, the number of advance notices of proposed rulemaking issued governmentwide has dwindled from a high of 66 in 2010 to a low of 27 in 2013, followed by 43 in 2014 and 15 through the first six months of 2015, according to a June 23 report from George Washington University's Regulatory Studies Center.
However, only 8 percent of the advance notices of proposed rulemaking were attached to economically significant rules, the report said. More than half (59 percent) were associated with “nonsignificant” or “substantive, but not significant” rulemakings.
Those numbers suggest a missed opportunity to get the public more involved in important rulemakings, Sofie Miller, senior policy analyst at the Regulatory Studies Center and co-author of the report, told Bloomberg BNA June 30.
“Anything that agencies do to get more public input is probably constructive,” Miller said.
Miller further said that advance notices—which are not required under the Administrative Procedure Act—can be used to get more buy-in from stakeholders before they move forward on their rules.
In some cases, however, agencies face tight statutory deadlines that don't give them time to invite more participation, Miller said.
Some worker advocates hailed the news that advance notices of proposed rulemaking are being used less frequently, arguing that agencies use them either to give the false appearance that they are hard at work on rules or to stall rules they don't actually want to push forward.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has a particularly spotty history of abusing advance notices and other voluntary pre-rulemaking steps, such as requests for information, said Adam Finkel, a former OSHA health standards director.
Some union representatives have argued that for highly specialized rulemakings, an advance notice does little to draw more engagement out of the few stakeholders who are already participating in the process.
“Our greatest problem with the use and misuse of ANPRMs is the succession of unreasonable—and usually politically driven—obstacles and delays,” Eric Frumin, safety and health director at Change to Win, told Bloomberg BNA June 30.
But at agencies whose rules affect larger groups of stakeholders, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, an advance notice of proposed rulemaking can make sense, said Finkel, now executive director of the University of Pennsylvania Law School's Penn Program on Regulation.
In such cases, advance notices can actually save time by eliminating surprises later in the rulemaking process that must be fought over.
“Sometimes [an agency's] heart isn't in it, and they just put out an ANPRM to waste everybody’s time,” said Finkel. “But there are times when they really do feel like it’s worth, in the long run, getting a preview.”
According to the George Washington University report, the most advance notices issued during the study period came from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, with 81. Second on the list was the Department of Transportation (45), followed by the Department of the Interior (40), the Agriculture Department (39) and the EPA (31).
The Labor Department ranked 11th, with 15 advance notices of proposed rulemaking.
To contact the reporter on this story: Stephen Lee in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
The George Washington University report is available at http://tinyurl.com/qfqs4ha.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)