Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
By Michael Greene
Dec. 30 — The National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable Dec. 29 filed a supplemental brief asking a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to reaffirm its holding that the SEC's conflict minerals rule violates the First Amendment.
In their brief, the three groups claim that contrary to the SEC's arguments, the D.C. Circuit's ruling in an unrelated case—American Meat Institute v. Dep't of Argiculture—reaffirms that an earlier U.S. Supreme Court decision—Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel—“does not apply unless the government-mandated statements are ‘of purely factual and uncontroversial information about the good or service being offered.'”
Accordingly, the appellants urge the court to amend its earlier ruling only “to clarify” that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rule “is not a ‘purely factual and uncontroversial' disclosure requirement within the meaning of Zauderer.”
The SEC rule requires companies and foreign private issuers in the U.S. to disclose their use of so-called “conflict minerals”—gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjacent countries—if those minerals are “necessary” to a product made by the companies.
In April, a split D.C. Circuit panel deemed the rule unconstitutional to the extent that it requires issuers to report to the commission and to state on their websites that any of their products have not been found to be “DRC conflict free”.
The panel concluded that the lower standard of First Amendment scrutiny under Zauderer didn't apply to the case because Zauderer review is limited to disclosures that are reasonably related to the government's interest in preventing consumer deception.
In July, however, the full D.C. Circuit concluded in American Meat that Zauderer review may apply to “government interests” as well as “correcting deception”.
In light of American Meat, the panel—comprising Judges A. Raymond Randolph, Sri Srinivasan and David Sentelle—Nov. 18 granted the SEC and Amnesty International's rehearing petitions. The panel asked the SEC and the other parties in the case to submit supplemental briefs explaining what impact American Meat has on the case's First Amendment issue.
The SEC in its Dec. 8 supplemental brief claims that the D.C. Circuit's en banc ruling in American Meat “makes clear that the conflict minerals disclosure is consistent with the First Amendment”.
“The en banc court held that Zauderer applies to commercial disclosures of ‘purely factual and uncontroversial information about the good or service being offered' so long as they are supported by any sufficient governmental interest,” the SEC said. It added that the government's interest in “promoting peace and security in the DRC is substantial, even compelling.”
According to the business groups' supplemental brief, however, there are at least three reasons why the rule's compelled statement of whether products are “DRC conflict free” is not purely factual and uncontroversial: “it conveys an ideological and moral judgment rather than pure factual information; it is highly misleading and susceptible to misinterpretation; and it forces companies to convey a governmental position on a controversial topic.”
The business groups claims that the SEC's brief and other opposing briefs “focus on the required factual descriptions of the scope and results of due diligence investigations—which our constitutional claim never challenged—rather than on the mandate that companies then add the non-factual and highly controversial statement that those facts mean a product is not ‘conflict free.'”
According to the business groups' brief: “The First Amendment bars laws that require private speakers to parrot the government’s chosen vocabulary and contested characterization of a policy issue.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at firstname.lastname@example.org
The supplemental brief is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Natl_Assoc_of_Manufacturers_et_al_v_SEC_et_al_Docket_No_1305252_D/23.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)