The Accounting Policy & Practice Report ® provides financial accounting policy makers, advisors, and practitioners with the latest news, expert insights, and guidance on emerging, evolving, and complex accounting issues. Expert News & Commentary.
July 6 — The American Institute of CPAs' Auditing Standards Board proposed a uniform set of principles for auditors to evaluate the validity of management's determination of whether the company is economically viable enough to be a “going concern.”
AICPA's Auditing Standards Board (ASB) said its July 6 exposure draft is intended to give auditors one set of principles to apply to different accounting frameworks for making the “going concern” evaluation and end diversity in auditing practice.
The ASB's exposure draft says auditor's objectives should be to:
The ED also includes proposed amendments to auditing standards addressing:
Depending on the framework—U.S. GAAP, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards, or International Auditing and Assurances Standards Board—auditors choose between different rules to evaluate going concern, according to the ASB.
Under U.S. GAAP—FASB's ASU No. 2014-15 (10 APPR 785, 8/29/14), the company is required to evaluate whether there is “substantial doubt ” that the entity will continue as a going concern either “within one year of the date the financial statements are issued.”
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board gives management one year beyond the financial statement date. If, however, the government entity knows information that would raise “substantial doubt” within an additional few months following that tear, then “such information also should be considered.”
The PCAOB issued Staff Audit Practice Alert No. 13: “Matters Related to the Auditor's Consideration of a Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” to clarify what rules auditors of public companies should apply in light of the changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles in 2014 (10 APPR 882, 9/26/14).
The International Accounting Standards framework—IAS 1—requires management to look ahead in its “going concern” evaluation for at least a year, but also requires management to take into account “all available information about the future.”
IAS 1, unlike the U.S. standards, doesn't define “material uncertainties' or “significant doubt,” according to PCAOB's discussion in staff audit practice alert No. 13.
The ASB's exposure draft instead suggests the term “reasonable period of time,” which is defined as “the period of time required by the applicable financial reporting framework or if no such requirement exists, one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.”
The ASB's explanatory memorandum says that it aims to converge its standards with those of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
The ASB used ISA 570 as its model, according to the exposure draft, but with language more commonly used in the U.S., such as by FASB and the GASB..
Some of the proposed amendments would apply to AU-C section 930, Interim Financial Information— financial information for the quarters between the annual financial statements.
The AICPA wants these paragraphs in the audit reports “to reinforce the consistency between the annual and interim financial information.”
Using “emphasis- of-matter paragraphs ” the auditors should explain their doubts about an entity's financial viability in the auditor report section of the financial filings—when an “auditor determines that a piece of information is so important that it is fundamental to a reader's understanding of the financial statement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Laura Tieger Salisbury in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Marcy at firstname.lastname@example.org
The Auditing Standards Board Exposure Draft is available at http://www.aicpa.org/Research/ExposureDrafts/AccountingandAuditing/DownloadableDocuments/20160705a_ED_Going%20Concern.pdf
Copyright © 2016 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)