Pension & Benefits Daily™ covers all major legislative, regulatory, legal, and industry developments in the area of employee benefits every business day, focusing on actions by Congress,...
Sept. 20 — Four American International Group Inc. retirement plans can share in a $725 million securities settlement between AIG and its investors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled ( In re Am. Int’l Grp., Inc. Sec. Litig. (Rothstein v. Am. Int’l Grp., Inc.) , 2016 BL 308876, 2d Cir., No. 14-4067-cv-L, 9/20/16 ).
In 2014, a federal judge denied the retirement plans a piece of the settlement pie on the grounds that they were “affiliates” of AIG and thus specifically excluded from profiting by the terms of the settlement agreement. Partly undoing that ruling, the Second Circuit said Sept. 20 that the “important statutory limits” placed on retirement plans by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act belied the idea that the AIG plans were affiliates of the company.
The $725 million settlement between AIG and shareholders resolved allegations first raised in 2004 that the company engaged in accounting fraud, stock price manipulation and other violations. With this ruling, AIG workers who invested in the company’s stock through their retirement accounts will reap similar benefits to those who invested outside of a retirement plan, the Second Circuit said.
In allowing the AIG retirement plans to share in the settlement, the Second Circuit focused on the “substantial” limitations that ERISA places on a company like AIG on its ability to control its retirement plans.
The Second Circuit declined to follow a decision in which the Seventh Circuit addressed an “almost identical fact pattern.” In that case, the Seventh Circuit said that a 401(k) plan sponsored by Motorola Inc. was barred from sharing in a $190 million securities settlement as an “affiliate” of the company because the committee that oversaw the 401(k) plan served “at the pleasure” of Motorola’s board of directors.
According to the Second Circuit, the Motorola decision failed to consider the role ERISA plays in limiting an employer’s control over its retirement plan. Because ERISA requires that plans be managed for the exclusive benefit of participants and beneficiaries, employers like AIG lack the type of control over their plans that might be expected in a “garden variety parent-affiliate relationship,” the Second Circuit explained.
This reasoning is consistent with the Department of Labor’s stated position that ERISA plan participants shouldn’t be disadvantaged when compared with other shareholders who benefit from securities litigation settlements, the Second Circuit said. The decision also accords with the position of the American Benefits Council, which filed an amicus brief urging the Second Circuit to allow the plans to share in the settlement.
Following this ruling, a district judge will be tasked with determining how much of the $725 million settlement fund belongs to the AIG retirement plans.
Judge Rosemary S. Pooler wrote the court’s decision, which was joined by Senior Judge Robert D. Sack and District Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
Alston & Bird LLP represented the AIG retirement plans. Labaton Sucharow LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP represented the AIG investors seeking to exclude the retirement plans from the settlement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jacklyn Wille in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the decision is at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/SHARYN_ROTHSTEIN_MARISA_ROTHSTEIN_MOLLYE_ROTHSTEIN_Objector_ALAN_.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)