Daily Report for Executives provides in-depth coverage of unfolding legislative, regulatory, and judicial news from the nation’s capital, the states, and around the world. This daily news service...
Consumer advocates and some lawmakers concerned about airline passenger rights say they worry the White House proposal to strip air traffic control from the government hands over too much control to the nation’s airlines.
Proponents say the proposal will allow technological advances and a reliable fee-based funding stream exempt from the political jockeying of annual appropriations.
The goal of the plan is to move air traffic control to a non-governmental body, a plan modeled on a failed 2016 bill by House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-Pa.). Consumer groups, however, say the effect of the hand-off will be higher fees and cost-shifting onto consumers.
The president’s plan would speed up modernization efforts and benefit passengers by reducing delays, Airlines for America, an airline industry group, said in a June 5 statement.
“I think that’s all bogus,” Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee ranking member Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) told Bloomberg BNA. Nelson also serves on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, and Data Security.
The president’s air traffic control proposal would give “carte blanche” to the airlines, which have an “abysmal” track record of taking on fees and being unresponsive to the needs of the flying public, National Consumers League Executive Director Sally Greenberg said.
Air traffic control is currently funded through taxes, but under the new regime, costs would be covered through user fees.
“We have no reason to believe the scenario will be any different if [the airlines] ran and operated the air traffic control system. For them, it’s just a power grab which would enable them to raise fees and rates and add on taxes, etc., to consumers without any real oversight,” Greenberg told Bloomberg BNA.
The White House proposal initially would give the airlines just two dedicated seats on the 13-member governing board for the new air traffic entity. Unions, airports, general aviation, and government would also have seats within the organization. That board structure would only be in place initially, meaning the airlines could eventually control more of the organization than the initial two seats.
“Privatization eliminates the chance for Congress and the American people to provide oversight, creates uncertainty in the marketplace, and is likely to raise costs for consumers,” Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), chairman of the consumer protection subcommittee, said in a statement June 5.
Shuster frequently references the paper slips controllers use to help monitor the flow of air traffic, saying his proposal would expedite the implementation of digital systems. The union for air traffic controllers supported the 2016 Shuster bill because they wanted to see technological advances, which they believe have been slow and expensive under the Federal Aviation Administration.
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association did not give a full-throated endorsement to the White House proposal, stating June 5 that the union needed to see the specifics of the legislation first.
Consumer groups, however, question whether the airlines could be trusted to invest the user fees in better technology.
“All this talk about modernization. I’ll believe it when I see it,” Greenberg said.
Nelson also questioned whether airlines were any better equipped to upgrade the nation’s air traffic control operations.
“Airlines are having trouble with their IT systems. Now do you want to turn over air traffic control—the safest in the world, in the most complicated airspace in the world—you want to turn that over to the airlines?” Nelson said to Bloomberg BNA.
The air traffic control proposal could move forward as part of the Federal Aviation Administration authorization, due by Sept. 30.
Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao will discuss FAA reauthorization and the air traffic control proposal at a Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing on June 7 and a House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure hearing on June 8.
To contact the reporter on this story: Shaun Courtney in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)