Stay current on the latest developments from agencies including the CFPB, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC to advise clients on real-life regulatory situations.
Claims that Amazon.com Inc. has deceived customers about discount prices aren’t likely to derail the company’s planned acquisition of Whole Foods Market Inc., antitrust analysts told Bloomberg BNA.
The Federal Trade Commission is under pressure from groups such as California-based Consumer Watchdog to closely scrutinize the $13.7 billion Amazon-Whole Foods deal because of Amazon’s market impact. But given how U.S. antitrust analysis typically works, claims of price deception or other consumer violations are separate from the merger’s impact on the market. That could mean that the FTC would punish Amazon for some type of consumer violation but still approve the Whole Foods purchase.
A Consumer Watchdog complaint filed with the FTC on July 6 says Amazon has for years been using inflated general market prices to trick customers into thinking that they’re getting a deal on Amazon products. The complaint urges the agency to block the Whole Foods deal unless Amazon formally consents to “stop its deceptive, unfair and anticompetitive pricing.”
The FTC is looking at the Consumer Watchdog complaint as part of the merger review, according to Reuters.
Separately, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union made public July 21 a letter from 12 congressional Democrats to the FTC and the Justice Department expressing concern that the Amazon-Whole Foods merger could adversely impact African-American communities that don’t have access to fresh fruit, vegetables, and other healthy foods.
The lawmakers’ request that regulators examine the merger’s impact on “food deserts” shows the wide potential reach that people are attributing to the proposed tie-up.
But when it comes to claims of deceptive prices, they’re unrelated to merger review. “This issue will have no effect on the merger review, because the nature of the problem is derived from different law,” Roger Noll, a Stanford University professor of economics, told Bloomberg BNA. “Whether Amazon violated consumer fraud law is unrelated to whether the acquisition of Whole Foods substantially reduces competition.”
FTC spokeswoman Betsy Lordan declined to comment on whether the agency is reviewing Amazon’s pricing practices. “As a matter of policy, the FTC does not confirm the existence of investigations, or comment on them,” she told Bloomberg BNA.
An Amazon spokeswoman said that Consumer Watchdog’s claims are “deeply flawed, based on incomplete data and improper assumptions.”
“We validate the reference prices provided by manufacturers, vendors, and sellers against actual prices recently found across Amazon and other retailers,” she said in an email.
Consumer Watchdog’s complaint against Amazon comes under the purview of the FTC’s consumer protection bureau, which could address the issue on a separate track from the Whole Foods merger, according to Herbert Hovenkamp, a professor of legal studies and business ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.
The merger review takes place in the FTC’s competition bureau.
“If there has been any false or misleading behavior, the consumer protection bureau has the authority to issue a cease and desist order to prevent the firm from doing that sort of thing,” Hovenkamp told Bloomberg BNA. “But it would not ordinarily bleed into a merger inquiry in the competition bureau.”
It’s hypothetically possible to have two separate inquiries into Amazon, even though price information relevant to both analyses is being fed to the same agency, and there may be overlap among staff, Noll added. “To assign both tasks to the same people does not mean that the two cases overlap legally,” he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alexei Alexis in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)