Keep up with the latest developments and legal issues in the telecommunications and emerging technology sectors, with exclusive access to a comprehensive collection of telecommunications law news,...
Jan. 20 — Publicly posting an allegedly defamatory Facebook post doesn't create enough of a connection with a state for a court to exercise personal jurisdiction, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, ruled Jan. 14.
Justice Richard D. Fybel wrote that the plaintiffs in this case would need to show that defendant Douglas Burdick expressly aimed or specifically directed his conduct at California. The plaintiffs said Burdick posted on Facebook that he would share “scandalous information” about the plaintiffs, who wrote blog entries that questioned the safety and efficacy of NeriumAD, a skin-care product.
Plaintiffs George Taylor and John Sanderson alleged that Burdick and his colleagues at Nerium International engaged in a harassment campaign against them based on their blog posts about NeriumAD. The court said Burdick's Facebook post said he would share information, including why one allegedly used multiple Social Security numbers and how many times one allegedly was charged with domestic violence.
The court directed the lower court to rule on the plaintiffs' request for jurisdictional discovery and quash the summons if there was no evidence that personal jurisdiction was warranted.
“We agree with those cases holding that merely posting on the Internet negative comments about the plaintiff and knowing the plaintiff is in the forum state are insufficient to create minimum contacts,” the court held. It explained that due process rights under the U.S. and California constitutions require that a defendant have sufficient minimum contacts with a state for a court there to exercise jurisdiction.
According to the opinion, Burdick lives and works in Illinois and was within that state when he uploaded the allegedly defamatory Facebook post.
The court said the U.S. Supreme Court in Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115, 2014 BL 49900 (2014), held that a state may exercise jurisdiction when that defendant's relationship with the state “arises out of contacts that the ‘defendant himself' creates with the forum State” and that the defendant's contacts must be with the state itself, “not the defendant's contacts with persons who reside there.”
Although the Supreme Court left “for another day” how to address jurisdictional issues when intentional torts are committed on the Internet, the California appellate court said the Walden ruling's principles meant the question was whether the Facebook post created a substantial connection between Burdick and California.
“Plaintiffs did not produce evidence to show Burdick's personal Facebook page or the allegedly defamatory posting was expressly aimed or intentionally targeted at California, that either the Facebook page or the posting had a California audience, that any significant number of Facebook ‘friends,' who might see the posting, lived in California, or that the Facebook page had advertisements targeting Californians,” the court said.
It added that the fact that Burdick's Facebook page was public would actually make it “less likely Burdick had intentionally targeted California as opposed to any other jurisdiction.”
Dorsey & Whitney LLP represented Taylor and Sanderson. Stephens Friedland LLP and Horvitz & Levy represented Burdick.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)