Employee Benefits News examines legal developments that impact the employee benefits and executive compensation employers provide, including federal and state legislation, rules from federal...
Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting Inc. must defend allegations that it acted imprudently by selecting and monitoring certain investment options, including JPMorgan’s target-date funds, in Safeway Inc.'s 401(k) plan.
The lawsuit’s allegations—that Aon offered little more than boilerplate investment advice in which it generally rubber-stamped the recommendations of JPMorgan while failing to offer meaningful advice regarding available investment alternatives—are sufficient to support allegations that its decision-making process was flawed, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held Dec. 11.
Tigar rejected Aon’s argument that it didn’t breach its fiduciary duty of prudence because it had in place a “master consulting agreement” with Safeway that established Aon’s “robust process” in providing “ongoing consulting and performance evaluation.” The terms of the agreement, standing alone, can’t establish that Aon acted prudently, and the fact that an agreement exists doesn’t prove it was followed, Tigar said.
The judge took issue with the claim that Aon—the plan’s investment adviser—allegedly breached its duty to diversify under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The basic contention that Aon and Safeway breached their duty by offering too few passive investment options is conclusory and fails to state a valid claim under ERISA, Tigar said in dismissing the claim.
The ruling is the latest development in a couple of lawsuits filed last year against grocery chain Safeway. The other lawsuit also accused Safeway of allowing high administrative fees and selecting and retaining “opaque, high-cost, and poor-performing investment options” in its retirement plan. Earlier this year, Tigar declined to dismiss the lawsuits against Safeway, holding that the challenges to the JPMorgan funds didn’t rest solely on fees. Rather, Safeway was allegedly influenced by JPMorgan’s “notorious history” of unlawfully steering clients toward its own proprietary funds.
Tigar’s latest ruling is noteworthy because it also allows the participant to advance her duty-of-prudence claim under the allegation that Aon was aware of the potential conflict of interest with JP Morgan and it failed to act on this information.
A growing list of companies have been sued under ERISA for allowing allegedly expensive and poorly performing target-date funds in their retirement plans. Target-date funds aim to address retirement savings needs by investing in a single fund that accounts for an investor’s retirement date, turning more conservative as the date approaches.
Earlier this year, Wells Fargo defeated a proposed class action claiming it filled its 401(k) plan with high-fee, poorly performing target-date funds affiliated with the company. A challenge over Insperity Inc.'s in-house target-date funds recently survived a motion to dismiss and won class certification.
Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah LLP, Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier LLP, and Sahag Majarian II represent the participant. Trucker Huss APC represents Safeway. O’Melveny & Myers LLP represents Aon Hewitt.
The case is Terraza v. Safeway, Inc. , N.D. Cal., No. 3:16-cv-03994-JST, order granting in part co-defendant’s motion to dismiss 12/11/17 .
To contact the reporter on this story: Carmen Castro-Pagan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)