Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
By Michael Greene
Feb. 9 — During a recent Bloomberg BNA webinar, practitioners discussed the implications of a Delaware Supreme Court ruling that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. was required to hand over internal documents under an exception to the attorney-client privilege.
The Wal-Mart decision marked the first time the state's high court held that the Garner doctrine applies in plenary stockholder/corporation proceedings, as well as in actions brought pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law § 220 actions.
Kathaleen S. McCormick, a partner at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, said that although the decision gave corporations cause for concern, corporations typically will not be required under Delaware law to reveal privileged information in § 220 books and records actions. Instead, she added, the Wal-Mart outcome will be really difficult outcome for other stockholders to achieve.
According to McCormick, the Garner doctrine's application to §220 actions has been the law in Delaware for a long time, even though the Delaware Supreme Court had never directly applied it before the Wal-Mart decision.
The Supreme Court has referred to it in dicta several times, she said, adding that the reason the court had not applied it directly before was because it is always the last issue addressed in the context of a §220 demand.
According to the material included the presentation, before the court will apply the Garner analysis, several threshold events must be shown, including:
• a demand was made;
• it was in an appropriate form;
• the stockholder waited five days before commencing an enforcement action;
• the stockholder stated that the specific purposes were to investigate (i) mismanagement, (ii) the possibility fiduciary breaches and (iii) whether a pre-suit demand would be futile;
• such purposes were subject to the credible basis requirement;
• confidentiality restrictions and conditions were imposed; and
• an analysis of whether the documents sought were necessary and essential was undertaken.
The Wal-Mart court emphasized that the “necessary and essential” analysis always preceded the Garner analysis, McCormick said.
Additionally, the court emphasized the that the Garner exception to the attorney-client privilege is “narrow, exacting, and intended to be very difficult to satisfy.”
According to McCormick, it was critical in the Wal-Mart decision that the plaintiff identified the documents that were being withheld and wanted the privileged information for the purpose of investigating claims of misconduct.
In addition to discussing the implications of the Wal-Mart decision, the panel also gave an overview of Delaware's law regarding §220 books and records inspections.
Brian D. Hail, a partner at Goodwin Procter, LLP, said that §220 actions have almost become a prerequisite to alleging demand futility in derivative actions. He added that the chancery court will look at such demand futility claims very skeptically and will evaluate whether a §220 demand was made first.
James M. Yoch Jr., an associate at Young Conaway, noted that discovery is limited in §220 actions. The court is constantly balancing the need to move the proceeding at an accelerated pace with the liberality of discovery rules, he added. This balancing can sometimes lead to disputes over what documents are produced, said Yoch.
It is also important to realize that corporations are not the only ones with discoverable information, Hail said. A client bringing a §220 action demand should be prepared to have its motives questioned, and to engage in document and deposition discovery, he added.
In addition to the scope and availability of documents, whether the demand was made for a proper purpose is usually the subject of the most scrutiny, Hail said.
The company is more likely to challenge more-intrusive inspections, Hail said.
“It's almost like a sliding scale,” McCormick said. When a stockholder is seeking something unintrusive, such as a stocklist, the company almost never rejects the request, she said. But where the request relates to broad allegations, such as in the Wal-Mart case, Delaware law imposes a slightly higher requirement: that there is credible basis for investigation those facts.
Although having an ulterior purpose alone may not be a sufficient reason for the court to deny a books and records request, it important to have a good-faith basis for the request that is relatively targeted, Hail said. Starting too broadly may preclude a happy compromise, he added. Moreover, the chancery court may view the entire inspection as a fishing expedition and deny the request.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)