Bloomberg BNA’s Corporate Law & Accountability Report is available on the Corporate Law Resource Center. This news service keeps corporate practitioners informed of legal developments of...
By Yin Wilczek
June 18 — Companies may want to reconsider their director compensation plans in the wake of a recent decision involving Citrix Systems Inc., attorneys said June 18.
The reason the decision merits attention is that “there's nothing extraordinary about it,” said Andrew Johnston, a partner at Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, Del. The numbers involved “don't snap out of a page at you.”
Andrew Liazos, a Boston-based partner at McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, agreed that is one of the reasons why the case is interesting. None of the pay involved was “staggeringly high” or “startling,” Liazos said. “We've all seen director pay within these limits.”
The attorneys spoke at a panel during an ALI-CLE executive compensation conference.
Liazos added that other similar cases are being brought, including a lawsuit filed earlier this month that accused Goldman Sachs Group Inc. directors of self-dealing. “This is not going to go away.”
According to slides for the panel, director equity awards were provided under separate formula plans until a change in rules in 1996. Currently, most director equity awards are included in shareholder-approved omnibus plans that also cover executives and key employees.
Unlike executive officers, there are no requirements for non-employee directors to be subject to a limit on their equity grants, according to the slides. The common practice for omnibus stock plans is either not to include a grant limit for director equity grants or to impose the same limit that applies to executive officers under Section 162(m) of the tax code.
• consider having separate equity award limits for director compensation, to avoid the entire fairness standard of review;
• consider alternatives for designing director compensation limits;
• obtain independent advice when developing peer groups for director equity compensation, evaluating peer group practices and establishing limits; and
• where possible, avoid having directors approve their own individual director compensations, such as compensation for a special committee.
Liazos noted that a “likely conversation” that may occur is should a company include a specific per-director equity limit and if it does, how should it be designed? Should there be a dollar limit rather than a limit on the number of shares? he asked. In addition, should it consider the fact that directors may hold different positions, such as committee chairman? How about new directors?
There are a “lot of issues to think through in terms of designing a limit,” Liazos said. He added that the “big wild card” is what Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. is going to do. “Are they going to decide they want to wade into these waters by setting forth some sort of best practice?”
Martha Steinman, a New York-based partner at Hogan Lovells US LLP, agreed that there will be “a lot of dialogue around what limits to put in” given directors' varying pay and positions. There will be “some tension” in imposing director limits between “wanting it to look like what director compensation looks like in people's minds versus” the need for companies to have flexibility in “that number,” she said.
In other remarks, Johnston noted that companies should expect more litigation around failures to comply with compensation plan terms. “The director compensation piece” will be the area that the plaintiffs' bar focuses on going forward, he said.
Liazos also warned that there will be more litigation over Section 162(m). Under the provision, the Internal Revenue Service does not allow public companies to deduct compensation over $1 million per year for their chief executive officers and their next four highest-paid executives unless the compensation meets certain requirements.
What companies should keep in mind with respect to executive compensation-related lawsuits is that plaintiffs' law firms are searching through proxy disclosures for Section 162(m) violations, Liazos said. “They're looking for more than just the blocking and tackling errors,” such as a company exceeding plan limits, he added. “They're also looking for” other, more “esoteric violations that go far beyond what we’ve ever seen in IRS audits.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Yin Wilczek in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)