Environmental due diligence is a critical component of any property transaction where potential environmental risks are a concern—minimize risks and protect yourself from...
State-friendly changes to waste laws could be on the industry advocacy agenda under the Donald Trump administration, state representatives and waste attorneys told Bloomberg BNA.
Some stakeholders recently proposed changes to regulations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act programs regulations to Trump advisers, Don Elliott, a Covington & Burling LLP lawyer and former Environmental Protection Agency top-ranking legal official, told Bloomberg BNA.
State representatives and other attorneys said a range of changes could ease regulatory burdens and optimize EPA efficiency.
Elliott said such changes likely will involve federal devolution to state authority, meaning state programs would take on more cleanup responsibility.
“Trump has committed to downsize the agency substantially, but he said he won’t get rid of it,” Elliott told Bloomberg BNA. “Superfund would be about the only thing you could see turned over to the states.”
States have robust delegated compliance programs under the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act.
Industry is eyeing a broad range of deregulatory initiatives in the next administration, ranging from easing oil and gas regulations to eliminating the Waters of the U.S. rule.
CERCLA doesn't provide the EPA with the authority to delegate compliance to states. That marks a distinction from air, water and RCRA laws.
That likely will make state devolution of regulatory authority a daunting task, Stephen Smithson, a lawyer with Snell and Wilmer, told Bloomberg BNA.
“With superfund, as currently enacted, I think they would have difficulty delegating regulatory authority to the states,” Smithson said, who is based in Salt Lake City. Superfund provides the regulatory framework for the EPA to investigate, evaluate and remediate contaminated sites nationwide often with the help of states and EPA regions.
Nearly all states have superfund programs, but staffing levels and responsibilities vary. For substantial sites, the EPA rarely delegates comprehensive superfund assessment and remediation to state programs.
Meanwhile, RCRA establishes a framework for the majority of states to implement and administer their own federally compliant management programs for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste, known as municipal solid waste.
States lack the resources—and possibly the willingness—to absorb many superfund obligations, according to Bonnie Gestring, a mining expert with the nonprofit environmental advocacy group Earthworks,
“The states simply can’t afford the cost of cleaning up the nation’s most toxic sites. They don’t have the financial resources to tackle superfund sites, particularly those with no responsible party,” Gestring said, referring to companies with contamination liability. “If those responsibilities are pushed to the states, it will leave the millions of Americans living near these sites with little hope for cleanup.”
Larry Schnapf, a transaction attorney based New York City, echoed those concerns, adding that industry pressure could weaken state regulations.
“Local governments are susceptible to companies,” Schnapf said. “Unless you create a level playing field, there would be a perverse incentive to deregulate in order to attract business.” In the event devolution occurs, he called for a federal standard.
Regulatory reform could require statutory changes by Congress, Smithson said. Schnapf, however, said the EPA under Trump might be able to interpret the statute to devolve some authorities to states. Lawmakers also could ax funding to the agency, Schnapf said.
Alexandra Dunn, executive director of the Environmental Council of the States, a nonpartisan association of state and territorial environmental commissioners, told Bloomberg BNA her organization would prefer that a new Trump administration eliminate some superfund state reporting requirements.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)