Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Nov. 3 — A voter initiative that has qualified for California's 2016 statewide ballot could hamper a state and federal plan to build twin tunnels around the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
Called the “No Blank Check” initiative, the measure would amend the state's constitution to give voters a say on whether revenue bonds could be issued or sold to raise more than $2 billion to help finance public works projects like the $15 billion proposed California Water Fix.
The tunnels, each 30 miles long and as wide as a two-lane interstate, are needed to deliver water from the wetter northern part of the state to farms and cities in the dry south.
The California Secretary of State's office said Nov. 2 enough voter signatures had been gathered to place the measure on the ballot.
Dean A. Cortopassi, a Stockton, Calif., farmer and food processor, his wife and family foundation provided the $4 million reported to the state so far to finance the petition drive that gathered the nearly 933,000 signatures. The Cortopassis have been outspoken critics of the water project.
A coalition of labor, business, water, agricultural and other entities has been formed to defeat the No Blank Check initiative, which they said “threatens to significantly disrupt infrastructure development, jobs” and the state's economy.
The measure would do much more than block the much-needed retooling of the hub of California's water infrastructure, the coalition called Citizens to Protect California Infrastructure said in a Nov. 2 written statement.
“Our state is suffering from a massive backlog of essential needs across the state, including outdated water systems that are vulnerable to earthquakes, crumbling roads and bridges and overcrowded hospitals and universities,” California State Building and Construction Trades Council President Robbie Hunter said.
Earlier this year, Gov. Jerry Brown and federal officials decided to scale back the twin tunnels plan, also called the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, after federal regulators said they would be unlikely to issue permits for the project. To try to win the federal permit, the project was redesigned. The delta restoration element was severed from the project and downsized.
Delta farmers and others still strongly oppose the project that some said would “hijack” water for industrial agriculture.
Meanwhile, the public comment period on the recirculated draft environmental document for the latest proposal ended Oct. 30.
Restore the Delta, a key group trying to block the project, said Oct. 30 that their opposition campaign had yielded 30,000 comments submitted from individuals and organizations against the tunnels plan.
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a water wholesaler that would help finance the project, said the state needs a solution “that works for the California economy and Delta environment.”
“We hope to be constructive participants to craft a final plan that has sufficient water supplies to merit this considerable investment while protecting the Delta's fragile environment,” MWD General Manager Jeffrey Kightlinger said in a written statement.
In an Oct. 30 joint statement, California Department of Resources Director Mark Cowin and David Murillo, the regional director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, said they expect to gain valuable information from the public comments.
The comments will be published when the environmental analyses are finalized, as required under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, they said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Carolyn Whetzel in Los Angeles at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)