Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
Sept. 9 — A 56-year-old Bank of America Corp. employee terminated in a reduction in force has no Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim because he can't show the employer's asserted performance-based reasons for selecting him for the RIF were a pretext for age bias, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Sept. 5.
Affirming summary judgment for Bank of America, the court said John Delaney, who worked for Bank of America and its predecessors for 22 years before his termination, failed to raise a triable issue that age was the “but for” cause of his discharge.
Rather, the evidence supports Bank of America's explanation that managers selected Delaney for the RIF based on instructions to choose underperforming employees whose dismissal would have the least impact on the business, the court said.
The evidence establishes that Bank of America “engaged in a RIF in September 2010 and that 418 other employees were included in that month's RIF list,” the appeals court said. “Although Delaney was the only member of the High Yield group to be terminated and also the oldest, the evidence supports [Bank of America's] assertion that Delaney was terminated because of his poor performance.”
Delaney received a rating of “exceeds/meets” expectations in his 2009 performance review, after a year in which his commissions exceeded $1.6 million while working for the Fixed Income Middle Markets Sales Group.
But the court said it was undisputed that after Delaney was transferred to the High Yield group in March 2010, his production fell off. He received a negative midyear performance review in July 2010.
When Bank of America selected Delaney for the RIF, he ranked 136th among all the company's sales personnel and his performance in the High Yield group was the worst of all employees at his level, the court said.
Delaney sought to introduce a former co-worker's draft Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charge that described alleged age-based comments by Bank of America managers.
But the district court properly excluded that document as hearsay, the Second Circuit said.
Even if such evidence were admissible, the court said, “comments about another employee's age, removed from any context suggesting that they influenced decisions about Delaney's own employment, do not suffice to create a genuine issue of fact as to whether age was the but-for cause of Delaney's termination.”
Delaney also alleged breach of contract, based on alleged oral promises that his compensation wouldn't suffer when management moved Delaney from Middle Markets to the High Yield group.
“The district court correctly noted that Delaney's various statements created an ambiguity as to the actual nature of the oral promise he asserted was made to him by” Bank of America, the Second Circuit said.
Under New York law, a contract can be formed without a written agreement, but the plaintiff must demonstrate that the terms of any agreement are definite, the court said. “Delaney's allegation that [Bank of America] promised that his compensation would not suffer lacks the definiteness required by New York law,” the court said.
Judges Ralph K. Winter, Richard C. Wesley and Peter W. Hall joined in the per curiam opinion.
Feder Kaszovitz LLP represented Delaney. Proskauer Rose LLP represented Bank of America.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kevin McGowan in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Delaney_v_Bank_of_Am_Corp_No_13184cv_2014_BL_247075_2d_Cir_Sept_0.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)