Bloomberg Law’s® Bankruptcy Law News publishes case summaries of the most recent important bankruptcy law decisions, tracks major commercial bankruptcies, and reports on developments in bankruptcy...
By Diane Davis
Oct. 28 — An attorney employed by a Chapter 7 trustee can recover $27,520 in fees he incurred for supplementing his fee application after the U.S. Trustee objected to it as deficient ( In re Stanton , 2016 BL 356911, Bankr. M.D. Fla., No. 8:11-bk-22675 Chapter 7, 10/26/16 ).
Judge Michael G. Williamson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida Oct. 26 concluded that the challenged fees were “more akin to the preparation — rather than defense — of a fee application.” The work was in service of the bankruptcy estate and recoverable under Bankruptcy Code Section 330(a), the court said.
In Baker Botts v. ASARCO, 135 S. Ct. 2158 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 330(a) doesn’t authorize attorney’s fees for work performed defending a fee application because that work isn’t performed for the estate.
The U.S. Trustee interpreted Baker Botts broadly and tried to impose a “bright-line” rule that any fees incurred supplementing a fee application after it has been objected to are unrecoverable. The court, however, rejected that “bright-line” rule, concluding that it is the “nature of the work — not when it is performed — that determines whether it is compensable.
The court approved the attorney’s second fee application, which supplemented his first application, because it benefited the estate and was necessary for the administration of the case.
The Chapter 7 trustee employed Herb Donica as his attorney and Ed Rice as special counsel. Donica and Rice pursued fraudulent transfer claims against debtor John Stanton’s ex-wife. Ultimately, they settled those claims and recovered $3.5 million in proceeds for the bankruptcy estate.
In his first fee application, Donica asked for $748,875 in attorney’s fees for nearly 2,000 hours of work. The UST objected to the fee application because it didn’t contain the level of detail required for a fee application in a Chapter 11 case, which isn’t required in a Chapter 7 case.
Donica filed an 18-page supplemental fee application providing more details. He then filed a second interim fee application seeking $33,840 for time spent on his initial application and other fees.
The UST objected that $27,520 of the fees were unrecoverable under Baker Botts.
The court held that Donica’s $27,520 in fees was for work in service of the estate that was recoverable as reasonable compensation under Section 330(a). Using Justice Clarence Thomas’ analogy that he used in Baker Botts, Donica’s work supplementing his fee application and responding to the UST’s objection was “akin to the mechanic’s preparation of an itemized bill as part of his ‘services’ to the customer.”
The UST was concerned that the court’s ruling will lead to a “de facto two-step fee application process” where professionals will be encouraged to file “bare-bones” fee applications and when challenged, will supplement their applications to provide more detail.
Those concerns are “misplaced,” the court said. The UST’s proposed bright-line rule would cause more problems than the “minor ones it solves,” the court said. Such a rule would (1) increase the cost of estate administration; and (2) increase the time and expense in litigating over fees, the court said.
Herbert R. Donica, Donica Law Firm P.A., Tampa, Fla., represented Chapter 7 Trustee; U.S. Trustee, Region 21, Benjamin E. Lambers, Timberlake Annex, Tampa, Fla.
To contact the reporter on this story: Diane Davis in Washington at DDavis@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jay Horowitz at JHorowitz@bna.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)