Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
Corporate boards could play a bigger role in getting rid of shareholder proposals under new guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Dealing with proposals submitted by investors has usually been the responsibility of company management, not directors, so getting boards more involved could represent a change for some companies.
Less than half of all proposals filed on topics ranging from climate change to corporate governance actually make it to a vote at companies’ annual meetings, according to data from Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. Sometimes it’s because companies and investors come to an agreement. Companies that think a proposal’s topic is irrelevant or insignificant can also ask the SEC staff to keep it off their ballot.
“We end up having to make a lot of judgments as to whether something is significant to a company,” William Hinman, who directs the commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, told Bloomberg Law Nov. 3. A company’s board of directors is “generally better positioned than the staff” to make that call, he said. So the division has told companies to help it decide whether to exclude a proposal by explaining their directors’ point of view.
Its Nov. 1 advice on blocking proposals doesn’t go as far as hoped by business groups, which have been pushing regulators to add restrictions to a system that they see as out of control. Investors argue that their concerns are overblown, since companies that receive proposals tend to get just one per year.
But, unlike a potentially lengthy SEC rulemaking or a legislative effort that’s considered a dead-end, the division’s comments came in time for this proxy season.
“This will be a very big deal if board involvement is a requirement for a company to exclude a shareholder proposal,” said Keir Gumbs, a former SEC attorney who’s now a Washington-based partner at Covington & Burling LLP. Boards are typically briefed on proposals, since they are the ones who make recommendations to shareholders for how to vote on them. But Gumbs said the board’s take isn’t always sought before trying to exclude a resolution.
Leah Malone, who is part of consultant PwC’s Governance Insights Center, said usually that responsibility rests with management. “So it’s interesting to me that the SEC is shifting more of the burden onto the board,” Malone told Bloomberg Law. Only about one-fifth of directors told PwC in a recent survey that their board has directly communicated with shareholders on proposals.
Hinman said the SEC staff’s guidance could end up encouraging “more meaningful” interaction between directors and investors.
For some companies, “it could be a shift,” Brian O’Shea, senior director of the Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said. He said others may already involve their boards in decisions about proposals.
The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance also addressed another one of the Chamber’s complaints: proposals submitted on behalf of a shareholder. This is oftentimes done by so-called corporate gadflies who, according to ISS, account for about one-third of all proposals that go to a vote. The SEC staff asked for more documentation on the individuals or firms behind these proposals, or else they might get blocked, too.
James McRitchie, one of the gadflies, said it was “troublesome” that the staff would give companies a “road map” for exclusions. McRitchie said he expects more companies to ask for, and get, permission to block proposals, especially on environmental and social issues.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Vittorio in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at email@example.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)