Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
July 13 — A California court has blocked state water officials from enforcing notices directing four agricultural water districts to halt diversions from rivers and streams.
Because the curtailment notices are “coercive in nature” and issued without formal administrative hearings, they violate the agencies' constitutional due process rights, the Sacramento Superior Court said in a July 10 temporary restraining order.
The decision and injunction come in one of several legal actions challenging the notices the State Water Resources Control Board sent to junior, and more recently some senior water rights holders, to manage scarce surface water during California's fourth year of drought.
Most of the actions include claims that the notices violate water rights holders' due process rights.
The West Side Irrigation District, Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency and Woods Irrigation District filed the petition for writ of mandate in late June.
Each of the water board's curtailment notices include the same language that the Sacramento Superior Court determined violate the constitution's due process clause, Steven Herum of Herum Crabtree Suntag in Stockton, Calif., who represents West Side Irrigation, told Bloomberg BNA July 13.
A July 30 hearing is scheduled to consider arguments for a preliminary injunction, Herum said.
The court rejected the SWRCB's claims that the curtailment notices are “informational” form letters and not enforceable on their own.
In the letters, the state requires recipients to immediately stop diverting water, the court said. Also, the letters require recipients to complete an online form within seven days to document receipt of the notices.
“Nowhere in this language do the Curtailment Letters assert that Petitioners are free to ignore the directive that they cease diverting water or that it is merely a suggestion,” the court said. “The Curtailment Letters, including the requirement that recipients sign a compliance certification confirming cessation of diversion, result in a taking of Petitioners' property rights without a pre-deprivation hearing, in violation of Petitioners' Due Process Rights.”
In 2014, the water board issued curtailment notices, but they were never enforced.
Many water rights holders, both this year and last year, have objected to the curtailment notices, arguing that administrative hearings were required and in some cases, that the state lacks authority to halt diversions.
Individual hearings are required to determine the availability of water, Herum said.
“Forcing the Board to undertake thousands of fact-specific, formal administrative hearings would likely swamp the Board's limited staff and fiscal resources,” Richard Frank, a University of California, Davis, law professor, said in a July 12 blog posting. “More importantly, it would defer—and quite possibly prevent altogether—the Board from taking the regulatory steps necessary to respond effectively to California's terrible drought and resulting water shortages.”
In a July 10 written statement, the SWRCB said it is reviewing the order, which “only concerns the specific form of notice letter sent in May and June.”
The court order, however, makes it clear that the water board is free to exercise its statutory authority to enforce state water code as to any water user, including the petitioners, if it finds them to be in violation of the law.
To contact the reporter on this story: Carolyn Whetzel in Los Angeles at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)