For over 50 years, Bloomberg BNA’s renowned flagship daily news service, Daily Tax Report® has helped leading practitioners and policymakers stay on the cutting edge of taxation and...
Nov. 7 — Tax policy may have not gotten the robust debate this election cycle some had hoped for, with the discussion gravitating toward the presidential candidates’ tax liabilities and their tax-exempt family foundations.
But Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump have discussed their visions for changing the tax code just enough to keep policy people hopeful that the winner will have enough interest in tax policy to work with lawmakers on some plans being discussed on Capitol Hill.
“During the election there has been markedly little time spent talking about tax policy of two candidates. Their policy prescriptions are diametrically opposed, but the big front-page stories about the plans never happened,” Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said Nov. 7. “That’s too bad, because both of these candidates are proposing to do interesting things.”
The number of references to taxes made during the presidential debates—129—is about average when compared to presidential campaigns since the 1970s. However, taxes have been more top-of-mind this cycle compared to when President Barack Obama ran in 2008 and 2012, Marc Gerson, a member at Miller & Chevalier Chartered, told Bloomberg BNA.
Trump’s tax plan, which has undergone several sets of revisions, includes lowering tax rates for individuals and businesses. Clinton’s plan raises taxes on some of the highest earners and introduces some new family-focused credits.
“If you want to do something like major changes to the tax code, you have to talk about it in the campaign. You have to create public support,” Gleckman said. “Without support from the White House, tax reform is never going to happen.”
The Obama administration had other priorities that didn’t include tax overhaul, said Gerson, who worked as a Republican tax counsel for the House Ways and Means Committee during the George W. Bush administration. Those pushing for big tax changes are waiting to observe the next president’s emphasis on taxes in the first-100-day agenda and in an acceptance speech, he said.
How candidates talk about taxes matters, said Kyle Pomerleau, director of federal projects at the Tax Foundation. The plan specifics usually aren’t important, but their general ideas set the tone for what they will pursue, he said.
“Obama in 2008 and 2012 hardly talked about taxes. Ronald Reagan, in both of his campaigns, aggressively talked about taxes, the first time about tax cuts, the second time about tax reform,” Gleckman said. “George W. Bush talked about tax reform and got it.”
The last large-scale tax overhaul in 1986 under Reagan is often touted by Republicans as a model to follow for another revamp of the tax code. House Republicans released a tax blueprint earlier this year that could serve as a starting point in negotiations. However, more plans are needed for tax overhaul discussions to be most productive, said Peter Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union.
“There is not the kind of legislative competition that we saw in the 1980s,” Sepp said. “That has to be the next step to tax reform.”
There is some conceptual agreement in Congress, especially about changes to the international side of the tax code, Gerson said. He said the amount of time and effort lawmakers have put into working on plans makes him optimistic.
However, the election has been nasty, and it isn’t clear how willing lawmakers in either chamber will be to work with whichever candidate is elected.
“Tax reform is hard to do. You have to have the absolute enthusiastic support of the president,” Gleckman said. “Congress cannot do this on its own.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Laura Davison in Washington at lDavison@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Meg Shreve at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)