Stay ahead of developments in federal and state health care law, regulation and transactions with timely, expert news and analysis.
Advocates are encouraged by the release of a Rural Health Strategy by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, but said the real proof of commitment to the initiative would be seen in future policies and programs.
“We’re cautiously optimistic,” said Audrey Smith, executive director of the Critical Access Hospital Coalition in Washington. “We really like to see they’re wanting to focus on rural health, but the devil’s in the details.”
“We’re thrilled they even used the word ‘rural,’” Alan Morgan, chief executive officer of the National Rural Health Association (NRHA), told Bloomberg Law May 9. “I can’t emphasize how profound that is. They’ve almost been consistent in the past with ignoring rural” areas and issues, he said.
Advocates said the real test of the CMS strategy—the agency’s first for rural areas of the U.S.—will come when the agency demonstrates it has incorporated rural viewpoints in upcoming rules and regulations, and whether it translates to things such as regulatory reductions for rural facilities. The CMS unveiled the strategy May 8, pledging to apply “a rural lens to CMS programs and policies.”
“We’ll be able to see right away whether or not they’ve actually applied that lens,” Morgan said. “It will come down to whether they’ve recognized what the impact will be on rural facilities and communities. Will there be carve-outs for rural? We’ll see.”
In addition to applying a rural lens to its policies and programs, the CMS strategy identified these objectives: Improve access to care through provider engagement and support, advance telehealth and telemedicine, empower patients in rural communities to make decisions about their health care, and leverage partnerships to achieve the strategy’s goals.
Morgan said he hopes the agency makes use of its local CMS offices in its outreach to providers, saying local offices typically have a better feel for what’s going on in rural communities.
In February, CMS Administrator Seema Verma said the strategy would aim to reduce regulatory burdens for rural facilities as it works to increase access to health care. Smith said the strategy was a bit vague on how it will reduce those burdens, saying she was hoping for something a “bit more tangible.”
Reporting requirements, for example, can be difficult for a small hospital to meet when “the c-suite has only one person in it.” She said it’s a problem when critical access hospitals—defined as having fewer than 25 beds—have the same regulations as larger hospitals. The strategy included no details on reducing burdens, she said.
The strategy touted continued collaboration across agencies with the Department of Health and Human Services, such as the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy at the Health Resources and Services Administration, to help implement the plan.
However, it failed to reference any coordination with the Federal Communications Commission, which administers the federal government’s telemedicine and telehealth programs for rural hospitals, Smith said.
After the FCC exceeded an annual $400 million funding gap, the FCC’s administrator for telehealth announced cuts of 15 percent for individual participants and 25 percent for consortia participants—two or more providers that request support as a single entity—in the commission’s Rural Health Program for the funding year that ends June 30. The program funds broadband services for facilities to enhance quality of care. Again, the strategy was silent about that, she said.
Hospital associations generally praised the CMS for recognizing that rural systems have particular needs. Indiana Hospital Association President Brian Tabor told Bloomberg Law in a May 9 email that the federal strategy is “attuned” to what rural centers need for their patients.
“Now more than ever, a focus is needed on ensuring patient access and promoting telehealth by eliminating barriers such as reimbursement and licensure issues across state lines,” he said.
The announcement comes at a time when rural health-care centers are hurting. Twenty percent of Ohio’s hospitals have negative operating margins, many of which are in rural areas of the state, John Palmer, spokesperson for Ohio’s Association for Hospitals, told Bloomberg Law in a May 9 email.
Nationally, rural hospitals also are struggling financially. More than 70 rural hospitals have closed since 2010, according to a University of North Carolina study, and a recent NRHA-sponsored study showed some 673 rural hospitals are “vulnerable or at risk for closure.”
David Boyer, a retired pharmacist on Medicare and part-time provider in a rural hospital, told Bloomberg Law he was “quite interested” in the CMS strategy since he was “living it” and not just reading about it.
Boyer, the co-president of the Council for Ohio Health Care Advocacy, a multidisciplinary association of health-care professionals, said the five strategies identified by the CMS were all important, but “not going to be a quick and easy fix.”
Improving outcomes in rural communities will require better technology, wider use of multidisciplinary treatment teams in outpatient settings, and supplying patients with the valid scientific research they need to take “an active part in their health care,” Boyer said.
Some health-care analysts were critical of the CMS announcement, saying it misses a broader problem.
Steve Wagner, executive director of the Universal Health Care Action Network of Ohio, told Bloomberg Law in a May 9 email that rural needs can be met better through systemic health-care equity policies that address medical professional shortages in urban and rural areas.
“Instead, they reinforce existing bias or add to the burdens that disproportionately affect communities of color,” Wagner said.
“It was a choice that rural, predominately white, counties in Ohio and Michigan are exempted from proposed new Medicaid requirements, while urban areas with equally significant unemployment (and racial diversity) are not exempt— jeopardizing health care coverage through Medicaid,” he said.
The No. 1 way to improve access to high-quality, affordable health care in rural communities is to fully expand Medicaid, Stacy Stanford, health policy analyst for the Utah Health Policy Project in Salt Lake City, told Bloomberg Law May 8.
“Too many low-income Utahns in rural areas are left without any options for health care because they fall into the Medicaid coverage gap,” she said. “Improving provider engagement, empowering patients, and advancing telemedicine are all noble goals—but they will only go so far without the backing of full Medicaid expansion.”
Hospitals in rural parts of Colorado disproportionately serve patients on Medicaid, and thus would be hurt by a rollback of the state’s Medicaid expansion, Joe Hanel, associate director of strategic communications for the Colorado Health Institute in Denver, told Bloomberg Law May 8.
Rural health has been in the news lately.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Brian Broderick at firstname.lastname@example.org
The announcement from CMS is at http://src.bna.com/yGH.
The CMS Rural Health Strategy is at http://src.bna.com/yGG.
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)