By Chris Bruce
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau March 6 urged a federal judge to block a potential appeal on what the CFPB may do if found to be unconstitutional ( Cons. Fin. Protection Bureau v. Fomichev , C.D. Cal., 16-cv-02724, response filed 3/6/17 ).
Dmitry Fomichev, the defendant in an enforcement case brought by the CFPB, wants the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review a November decision that said the bureau is unconstitutionally structured but that allowed the CFPB to continue its case against him.
The interlocutory appeal, if allowed, could take up questions in the wake of an October panel ruling by the D.C. Circuit that’s being scrutinized by the D.C. Circuit’s full court. The panel said the CFPB’s leadership structure violates the U.S. Constitution but that the agency may continue its work.
In its March 6 filing, the CFPB urged Judge Philip S. Gutierrez of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California not to certify questions teed up by Fomichev.
According to the CFPB, Fomichev’s bid for an appeal effort assumes that the Ninth Circuit also would find the CFPB’s structure unconstitutional and likely would fail, anyway. “Courts have uniformly allowed the Bureau to continue to pursue its enforcement actions despite any possible constitutional infirmity,” the March 6 filing said.
The filing is the latest move in the CFPB’s April 2016 suit against Fomichev, founder of a company that sells consumer loan information. The CFPB alleged unfair and abusive acts and practices by the company, and it said Fomichev provided “substantial assistance.”
In November, Gutierrez agreed with Fomichev that the CFPB is unconstitutionally structured, citing the D.C. Circuit panel’s decision involving PHH Corp. Even so, Gutierrez allowed the case to proceed and denied relief to Fomichev, who wants to send that dispute to the Ninth Circuit.
Fomichev wants two questions certified for review: “What is the proper remedy for this constitutional defect given the court’s holding that the Bureau is unconstitutionally structured? 2) Whether a party is barred from advancing an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a statute, based on the premise that the statute is not vague on its face, where a novel interpretation of the statute may encourage its discriminatory enforcement?”
Fomichev also has asked Gutierrez to consolidate his case with two others — Cons. Fin. Protection Bureau v. Gasparyan, C.D. Cal., No. 16-cv-02725, also filed in April 2016, and Cons. Fin. Protection Bureau v. D and D Marketing, C.D. Cal., No. 15-cv-09692, the first case in the trio, which was brought in December 2015.
According to Fomichev, all three cases arise from the same allegations and involve the same legal parties and claims.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce March 6 said it plans to file a friend-of-the-court brief in the PHH case in the D.C. Circuit. The constitutional issues in the PHH case, the filing said, “are of great importance” to businesses regulated by the CFPB.
Fomichev is represented by Steven B. Soltman and Thomas J. Rittenburg of Soltman Levitt Flaherty and Wattles in Thousand Oaks, Calif., and Raffi Kassabian of Reed Smith in Los Angeles.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Bruce in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Ferullo at MFerullo@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)