All Banking Law, All in One Place. Bloomberg Law: Banking is the comprehensive research solution that powers your practice with access to integrated banking-related legal news, analysis,...
By Chris Bruce
Oct. 19 — A recent federal appeals court ruling means the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau must abide by executive orders, including mandates for costs-benefit analysis in rulemaking, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) told CFPB Director Richard Cordray.
Hensarling's letter said the Oct. 11 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit means that the CFPB, created by Congress as an independent regulator, is an executive branch agency, subject to executive orders.
He asked Cordray for assurances by Oct. 26 that the CFPB would “comply in full” with several executive orders before issuing any future final rules, “including rules governing arbitration agreements; payday, vehicle title, and installment loans; and debt collection.”
The CFPB did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Hensarling's letter.
Any such mandates applied to CFPB rulemaking could slow efforts on big-ticket projects such as the CFPB's proposal to limit certain mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer financial services contracts.
At issue is an Oct. 11 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in favor of PHH Corp., a Mount Laurel, N.J., mortgage company that challenged a $109 million disgorgement order by CFPB's Cordray in June of last year.
Two judges on the three-judge panel that heard the case said the CFPB’s single-director structure violates the U.S. Constitution. They crafted a narrow remedy that ensures the CFPB's continued operation, but “as an executive agency akin to other executive agencies headed by a single person, such as the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury.”
As a result, Hensarling told Cordray, executive orders that apply to executive agencies “apply in full to the CFPB.”
Public Citizen Oct. 19 said the CFPB should reject Hensarling's call for a review of CFPB rules by the U.S. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
“The CFPB’s time to petition for review of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling has not yet expired, and accordingly it makes little sense for OIRA to review CFPB rules when the court decision is not final and could be reversed,” Regulatory Policy Advocate Amit Narang said in a statement. “Even if the decision were upheld, current law specifically identifies the CFPB as an independent agency that is excluded from the executive order requiring OIRA review. That law was not altered by the court’s opinion.”
Although the full implications of the D.C. Circuit's ruling are still being thought through, Hensarling's letter underscores what could be a growing interplay between the judicial process and the political process.
The D.C. Circuit's remedy was to strike a provision of Dodd-Frank that allowed the president to remove the CFPB director “for cause.” That leaves whoever is in the White House free to discharge Cordray at any time, raising the stakes for the agency as the November election approaches.
“In practical terms, this means the new President can pick his or her own person to run the CFPB just like he or she picks a new Attorney General or a new HUD Secretary,” Cowen & Co. analyst Jaret Seiberg said in commentary on the D.C. Circuit's decision. “It has become a political appointment.”
The CFPB is widely expected to appeal the decision. The agency recently said in a separate case that it expects to prevail on appeal.
Should the agency file an appeal—either for review by the D.C. Circuit's full complement of judges, or by the U.S. Supreme Court—the deadline for either petition falls after the Nov. 8 election, again raising the possibility that further action could be driven by the next administration's view of the case.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Bruce in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Ferullo at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)