Trust Bloomberg Tax for the international news and analysis to navigate the complex tax treaty networks and global business regulations.
Nicolas Zhu and Gilbert Shen, CMS China
Nicolas Zhu is a Partner and Gilbert Shen is a Senior Associate with CMS China
The legal environment for transfer pricing and anti-tax avoidance in China has changed significantly over the past few years. Chinese tax authorities are making continuous efforts to create a fairer and more transparent tax environment for international trade and cross-border transactions.
On June 7, 2017, Wang Jun, Commissioner of the China State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”), signed the BEPS Action 15 Multilateral Instrument on Tax Treaty Measures to Tackle BEPS (“MLI”) on behalf of the People's Republic of China (“PRC”), which marked one of the milestones in China's efforts towards anti-tax avoidance.
Looking back over the past few years, the China SAT has been devoted to improving the domestic legal environment for anti-tax avoidance. Guoshuifa  No. 2 Special Tax Adjustment Implementation Measures (“Announcement 2”), issued in 2009, used to be the key guideline for anti-tax avoidance and transfer pricing in China. From 2015, however, in the context of the OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”), the SAT started to issue a series of new rules and regulations, which has led to significant changes in the transfer pricing and anti-tax avoidance environment in China:
The SAT has introduced a general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) which serves as a broad general rule to crack down on tax avoidance arrangements.
From a historical perspective, the GAAR in China was originally introduced by Article 47 of the PRC Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”) Law in 2008. In 2009, with the release of Announcement 2, general principles on the implementation of GAAR were further provided. In 2014, the China SAT issued Administrative Regulations for the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (Trial) (“SAT Announcement  No.23”). In conjunction with the PRC CIT Law and Announcement 2, SAT Announcement  No.23 provides a more comprehensive and transparent legal environment for GAAR implementation in China.
According to the GAAR in China, license fees or service fees paid to related parties should match the economic benefit that the license/service brings to the licensee/service recipient. Tax authorities shall redefine the nature of a tax avoidance arrangement based on business substance, and revoke an enterprise's tax benefit obtained from the tax avoidance arrangements. Tax authorities may, from a tax perspective, deny the existence of enterprises without economic substance, particularly those which are established in tax havens and result in the tax avoidance of their associated or unassociated parties.
The GAAR is usually adopted in testing the reasonableness of related party transactions: one example could be the outbound payment of service fees, where the SAT has increasingly focused in recent years.
The following paragraphs provide a detailed introduction to the GAAR in China.
When tax authorities conduct a special tax adjustment based on Article 47 of the PRC CIT Law to address a deliberate “tax avoidance arrangement”, the GAAR shall apply. Generally, business arrangements with the two characteristics described below are likely to be deemed “tax avoidance arrangements”:
The above-mentioned term “tax benefits” refers to tax consequences such as CIT reduction, exemption or deferral.
However, according to Article 2 of Announcement  No.23, the GAAR does not apply to the following situations:
Further, according to Article 6, where a business arrangement falls within the scope of a typical special anti-tax avoidance arrangement, including transfer pricing, cost sharing arrangement, controlled foreign corporations, thin capitalization, etc., tax authorities shall first apply corresponding special anti-tax avoidance rules (which will be addressed later in this article). Similarly, if tax treaty provisions or a domestic rule on the application of a treaty is applicable (such as rules on beneficial ownership or limitation of benefits), such treaty provisions or domestic rules shall prevail over the GAAR.
According to the GAAR, tax authorities may adopt one of the following methods to deny the tax benefits obtained through a tax avoidance arrangement:
Local tax authorities are generally responsible for identification of cases subject to a tax special adjustment. However, considering that anti-tax avoidance cases are usually quite complicated, application for case registration shall be reviewed and approved by upper level tax authorities—the provincial tax authorities and the SAT.
Local tax authorities are generally responsible for carrying out the detailed process of investigation.
Tax authorities have the right to require taxpayers to provide sufficient information, including background information on the business arrangement, documents explaining the commercial purpose of such arrangement, internal documents related to the arrangement, etc. Upon receiving the Notice of Tax Assessment from the tax authorities, taxpayers are obliged to submit the required documents within 60 days. In special circumstances, a 30-day extension may be granted. If a taxpayer fails to provide the documents required, the tax authorities may deem an amount of tax payable based on the relevant regulations and standard procedures.
The tax authorities have the right to obtain information connected to overseas entities via information exchange systems, or other applicable methods. The tax authorities also have the right to require a party or individual that is involved in tax planning for the entity under investigation to provide relevant information and documents.
Upon receiving the SAT's approval for the case registration, the tax authority in charge shall proceed with the investigation within the following nine months. Final assessment shall be made based on the review and approval from provincial tax authorities and the SAT.
Upon receiving approval from the SAT, the local tax authorities in charge shall issue an Initial Notice of Special Tax Adjustment to the taxpayer. The taxpayer is allowed to appeal with the upper level tax authorities within seven days of receiving that Notice. The taxpayer's appeal will be reported to, and eventually assessed by, provincial tax authorities and the SAT. If the taxpayer accepts the tax assessment, or if the taxpayer's appeal is rejected, a final version of Notice of Special Tax Adjustment will be issued by the tax authority in charge.
If a taxpayer does not agree with the result of the tax adjustment, the taxpayer is allowed to seek legal assistance in accordance with applicable PRC law. Any domestic double taxation resulting from the tax adjustment shall be settled by the SAT. If the tax adjustment leads to cross-border double taxation, the taxpayer may apply to enter a mutual agreement procedure.
The SAT is making continuous efforts on anti-tax avoidance and special tax adjustment. In recent years, the following trends in the SAT's approach can be identified.
Over the past few years, only enterprises under a tax audit have been subject to monitoring by the tax authorities on an ongoing basis, over a five-year follow-up supervision period. With the release of Announcement 6, however, all enterprises in China will be monitored on their profit level over a period of time, through annual reporting of related party transactions. This means that enterprises with an unstable profit level are more likely to be identified and targeted for tax audit. This trend indicates that Chinese tax authorities are making efforts to work out a more comprehensive method for special tax investigation and adjustments. In this context, it is now more important than ever that enterprises in China should efficiently manage their transfer pricing risks through their daily operation.
Announcement 6 makes it clear that enterprises with the following typical characteristics will be more likely to be targeted for tax audit or special tax adjustment:
It is noteworthy that items seven to nine above are newly included in Announcement 6 compared to the previous regulations; we can see the trend that with more Chinese entities expanding their business overseas, Chinese tax authorities are increasingly paying attention to such so-called “go-global companies.”
Announcement 6 brings up the concept of “hidden related party transactions,” indicating that any hidden related party transactions which directly or indirectly result in the reduction of the SAT's overall tax income shall be restored for special tax adjustment purposes. For example, if a PRC enterprise provides services or licenses to an overseas related party free of charge, such transaction will be “hidden” as there is no cash flow of remuneration for the transaction. However, such “hidden transaction” can be restored, if evidence is found which can prove the existence of such transaction. Such “hidden transactions” are likely to increase with more Chinese enterprises expanding their business overseas.
Announcement 6 stipulates that an entity cannot share returns derived from intangibles if it only legally owns the intangibles without actually making contribution to the value creation of the intangibles. To assess the degree of contribution, various aspects have to be considered, including overall business model and operational status of the group, each group entity's activities in relation to development, enhancement, maintenance, protection, exploitation and promotion of the intangibles, etc.
It is worth noting that Announcement 6 provides for the principles of transfer pricing administration not only for “payment of license fees,” but also for “receipt of license fees.” This may also be seen as evidence that Chinese tax authorities are increasingly focusing on the go-global companies, which are gradually taking on the role of royalty licensors.
According to Announcement 6, related party services in line with the arm's length principle should be beneficial services and priced based on fair value under normal business circumstances. “Beneficial services” refers to the services which can bring direct or indirect economic interest to the service recipient, and where a non-related party is also willing to purchase or voluntarily carry out the service activities by itself in the same or similar situations. If an enterprise pays service fees to related parties for non-beneficial services, tax authorities can initiate special tax adjustment by disallowing the enterprise from deducting the full costs arising from the service charges from its taxable income for PRC CIT purposes.
Non-beneficial services mainly include the following:
It is noteworthy that, differently from developed countries which consider intangibles as one of the most important profit-making factors, Chinese tax authorities are emphasizing the contribution of location-specific factors, such as location savings, market premiums, etc., to an entity's profit-making capability. In other words, the Chinese tax authorities may hold the view that additional return should be returned to China, if extra profit has derived from such special location factors closely related to the Chinese market. The Chinese tax authorities' attitude towards location-specific factors is also reflected in another tax document—Announcement 64, which provides for new rules of administration on advanced pricing arrangements (“APAs”). According to Announcement 64, an APA application is more likely to be accepted by the tax authority if an applicant takes into consideration location-specific factors.
Cost Sharing Arrangements
Announcement 2 (Articles 69 and 74 being annulled) and Announcement 42 supply provisions on administrative guidance on cost sharing arrangements (“CSA”), according to which participants of a CSA are entitled to the beneficial right of the joint development or assignment of intangible property or participation in services, and therefore should bear the corresponding costs of such activities. The costs borne by the associated parties should be consistent with the costs which would be spent by unrelated parties seeking the beneficial right under comparable conditions. An enterprise's beneficial right associated with a CSA involving intangible assets or services should be based on reasonable and measurable expected returns and based on reasonable business assumptions and operational conversations. CSA participants are not required to pay a royalty for the use of intangible assets developed or received by the CSAs.
During the implementation of a CSA, if the actual costs which the participants share do not match the actual benefits received, compensating adjustments should be made based on the actual situation. The costs allocated to an enterprise under a CSA signed with its associated parties will not be tax deductible where:
Currently, in China, a CSA related to services is generally applicable to group purchase and group marketing planning activities. However, current CSA regulations in China have not provided clarifications on tax implementation and treatment: there is, therefore, still much to be done on a practical level with regard to CSAs in China.
Announcement 2 includes rules on controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”).
CFCs refer to foreign enterprises which are controlled by resident enterprises and/or individual residents of the PRC (“Chinese resident shareholders,” including Chinese resident enterprise shareholders and Chinese resident individual shareholders) and established in a country or region where the effective tax rate is 50 percent lower than the tax rate of 25 percent stipulated by the PRC CIT Law and which do not distribute profits or reduce profit distribution without reasonable business needs.
Announcement 2 provides a definition of “control”, which refers to situations where substantial control is formed in respect of shareholding, financing, business, purchase and sales, etc. “Control in respect of shareholding” refers to the situation where any single one of the Chinese resident shareholders directly (through a single layer) or indirectly (through multiple layers) holds more than 10 percent of total voting shares of a foreign enterprise in any day of the taxable year, and all of such Chinese resident shareholders jointly hold more than 50 percent of total shares of the foreign enterprise.
Moreover, Announcement 2 introduces a calculation method for percentage of shareholding when indirect multiple layer shareholding is involved, as well as a calculation method for deemed dividend income from a CFC that is to be included in the Chinese resident enterprise shareholder's taxable income of the current period.
The deemed dividend income may be exempt from being included in a Chinese resident enterprise shareholder's taxable income of the current period, if any one of the following conditions is met:
However, there are regulations to avoid double taxation—if the deemed dividend is already taxed overseas, the overseas income tax may be credited in accordance with relevant provisions of the PRC CIT Law or double tax treaties. In addition, if the profits actually distributed by a CFC have already been taxed in accordance with the PRC CIT Law, such profits can be excluded from the Chinese resident shareholder's taxable income of the current period.
According to the PRC tax regulations, for enterprises in China, any interest expense arising from the related party debt exceeding twice (for non-financial institutions) or five times (for financial institutions) the equity investment in the company cannot be deducted from the taxable income for CIT purposes unless sufficient evidence can be provided to prove that such loan arrangement is made on the arm's length principle. Announcement 2 (Article 89 annulled) and Announcement 42 provide for detailed rules on thin capitalization in China, including calculation methods, compliance requirements, etc.
Non-deductible interest expenses cannot be carried forward to the following tax years, and should be allocated among associated parties according to the proportion of interest actually paid to each associated party against total interest expenses. Such interest allocated to domestic parties which have a higher effective tax rate will be allowed to be deducted for CIT purposes, while interest paid to overseas parties directly or indirectly shall be deemed as dividend distribution, and any gap for tax liability between interest expense and dividend should be made up. Any tax overpayment which resulted from the above treatment will not be refunded.
The legal environment for transfer pricing and anti-tax avoidance in China has changed significantly during the past few years. Chinese tax authorities are continuously making efforts to create a fairer and more transparent tax environment for international trade and cross-border transactions. Foreign companies will need to pay increasing attention to transfer pricing and anti-tax avoidance regulations in China.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)