Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
By Peter Leung
May 3 — The U.S. Supreme Court's standard for determining whether to award attorneys' fees to the winner in a patent dispute should be applied to trademark cases as well, a federal appeals court ruled May 3.
In denying defendant Jeffrey Todd DeShong's motion for attorneys' fees, the trial court applied the incorrect standard of what constitutes an “exceptional” case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled.
In the decision, the 5th Circuit joins several other federal appeals courts in finding that the same standard should apply for awarding attorneys' fees in both patent and trademark cases.
Plaintiff Clive Baker and his organization, the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice Inc., sued DeShong for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The OMSJ has a service called the HIV Innocence Group, and DeShong has several websites, including www.hivinnocencegrouptruth.com, which purport to expose the OMSJ's misdeeds. Baker's lawsuit is based on claims that DeShong's website infringes his trademarks.
The district court dismissed the claims, and DeShong moved for attorneys' fees under § 1117 of the Lanham Act. The court denied the motion, saying that the case was not “exceptional” because DeShong did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that the plaintiffs brought the suit in bad faith.
Section 1117 authorizes attorneys' fees awards to the prevailing party in “exceptional” trademark cases.
The 5th Circuit reversed. It found that the Supreme Court's ruling in Octane Fitness LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1749, 2014 BL 118431, 188 L. Ed. 2d 816, 110 U.S.P.Q.2d 1337, 134 S. Ct. 1749, 2014 BL 118431, 188 L. Ed. 2d 816, 110 U.S.P.Q.2d 1337 (U.S. 2014) applies, even though that case discussed the section of law authorizing attorneys' fees award in patent and not trademark cases.
The court explained that § 1117 of the Lanham Act and the Patent Act's fees provision contain identical language, which means that Octane applies to trademark cases as well. Under this analysis, the party seeking fees does not have to prove that the other party acted in bad faith. Furthermore, the winning party does not have to prove that a case was exceptional under the higher “clear and convincing” standard (83 PTD, 4/30/14).
The trial court erred in requesting both bad faith and proof under the higher standard. Instead, an “exceptional” case justifying an attorneys' fees award is one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party's litigating position, or where the losing party litigated the case in an unreasonable manner.
Though the trademark and patent laws use identical language in authorizing attorneys' fees awards, the Copyright Act's provision uses different language. The Supreme Court is mulling this issue in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons Inc., having heard oral arguments in that case on April 25 (80 PTD, 4/26/16).
To contact the reporter on this story: Peter Leung in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Wilczek in Washington at email@example.com
Text is available at http://src.bna.com/eEL
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)