Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
May 7 — Regulations to reduce carbon pollution from power plants are a legal but imperfect tool to address climate change, and setting a carbon fee would be a better option if the political climate would allow it, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) told a Bloomberg Government breakfast May 7.
Carbon fee legislation “puts us in a better position to ameliorate the disruption that will occur as we make a transition from one energy portfolio to the other” though it may take “another election cycle” beyond the presidential election of 2016 before Congress would seriously consider such an option, Schatz said.
“There are some members of the Senate—on the Republican side—who are trying to thread a needle here and trying to survive or avoid a primary, but I think in their conscience, they want to do the right thing,” Schatz said. “These regulations are a relatively blunt instrument and don't put us in a position to help communities that are going to be disrupted. And legislation gives us that flexibility.”
Despite the political climate, Schatz and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) intend to introduce legislation in 2015 levying a fee on companies for every ton of carbon pollution emitted, which Schatz said would be the “best solution” to minimize disruption as the nation shifts to a cleaner energy portfolio.
Republican opposition in Congress to a carbon fee makes President Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan addressing carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's fleet of power plants the best option for the moment to ensure U.S. leadership on climate change, Schatz said.
In order to more seriously enter conversations about how to address climate change, Schatz said Democrats would have to first beat back attempts to block or eviscerate the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan.
The EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan (RIN 2060-AR33), which the agency expects to finalize in mid-summer, would establish unique carbon dioxide emissions rates for the power sector in each state.
States would be required to meet interim targets between 2020 and 2029, with a final emissions rate amounting to a 30 percent cut in 2030 from 2005 levels. States would have flexibility as to how best to meet their individual targets.
Schatz expressed confidence the Senate would successfully defend the regulations from attacks through the Congressional Review Act. He predicted several Democrats—“probably four or five”—might defect and back attempts to weaken the rules, but Republicans couldn't summon the numbers necessary to overcome a certain veto from Obama.
“After that is done, I think then there's room for a more adult conversation,” Schatz said.
The Hawaii Democrat has previously told Bloomberg BNA his caucus is preparing for the “next legislative fight” to be protecting Obama's climate regulations and ensuring international negotiations to address climate change aren't subjected to congressional interference.
Seth Larson, an aide to Whitehouse, told Bloomberg BNA the senators plan to introduce carbon fee legislation “in the next month or two” but didn't have a specific date yet.
Whitehouse and Schatz introduced legislation in November 2014 that would have required large greenhouse gas emitters to pay $42 for every ton of carbon pollution they emit. The fee would have increased annually by an inflation-adjusted 2 percent.
Similar legislation has already been floated in the House this session. The Tax Pollution, Not Profits Act (H.R. 2202), introduced by Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) on May 1, would tax emissions of greenhouse gases at $30 per metric ton of carbon dioxide in 2015 and increase the tax each year at 4 percent above inflation.
Funds collected through the tax would be used to reduce the corporate tax rate, provide monthly payments to low-income and middle-class households and create job training, early retirement and healthcare programs for coal workers.
To contact the reporter on this story: Anthony Adragna in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)