Life Sciences Law & Industry Report connects the dots among the many disciplines that make up the burgeoning life sciences industry, with biweekly updates on current regulatory, legislative,...
June 7 — The language of the proposed new Common Rule suggests federal agencies are mulling different options to the largest update to human subjects regulations in three decades, the attorney with a federal office on research protections said June 6.
“If you look at the preamble to the NPRM, there are a lot of questions being asked about alternatives to the NPRM proposals,” Laura M. Odwazny said at a research compliance conference in Baltimore. “So that’s sort of an indication that the federal agencies may be thinking of other ways of implementing changes to the Common Rule—not just what made it in the proposed changes into the codified regulatory text.”
Odwazny is a senior attorney with the Health and Human Services Office of General Counsel who advises the Office for Human Research Protections, the HHS office that administers the Common Rule. Her comments came amid a presentation on the notice of proposed rulemaking, “Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects” (45 C.F.R. 46), which most people in the research community refer to as “the NPRM.” Released last September, the 519-page proposed rule would reclassify all biospecimens as human subjects, require a single institutional review board (IRB) for multisite studies, add a new category of excluded activities and require shorter consent forms, among other changes (9 LSLR 1031, 9/18/15). Nearly 20 federal agencies have signed on to the Common Rule, which the federal government published in 1991.
“This is the biggest document in the last 30 years,” she said. “Just the fact that we got this far is amazing.”
The regulatory agenda lists this September as a date for a final rule (RIN:0937-AA02) .
“This isn’t a promise. It’s just a projection,” Odwazny said. “But this is the projection that everyone has been definitely trying to make a reality.”
When addressing the next steps for the proposed rule, Odwazny acknowledged that several questions linger:
While she said it's hard to say how the final rule will play out, “There's a lot of flexibility actually between what’s been posted in the NPRM and what the agency can provide as the corresponding final rule.”
“What’s important to understand is that the final rule has to be a logical outgrowth of the scope of the notice of proposed rulemaking proposals,” Odwazny said. “So that means that a regulated entity or interested party has to be able to reasonably anticipate from the NPRM proposals and the preamble language describing those proposals what the final rule will look like.”
Public comments play a critical role in this process of considering what constitutes a logical outgrowth of the proposed rule, Odwazny said. The OHRP received more than 2,100 comments, a strong majority of which objected to the proposed biospecimen provisions (10 LSLR 02, 1/22/16).
“All of your efforts in writing of the comments was not in vain,” she said. If a public comment suggested a “possible reasonable alternative” to the language in the NPRM, the final rule could possibly incorporate that suggestion if it is logical outgrowth of the NPRM, she said.
“The public comments are an important part of the process in assessing what the logical outgrowth will be of this NPRM and that will be the final rule—if there is one” she said.
At the same time, Odwazny said, rulemaking isn't a democratic process. “Even if every single proposal was thumbs down, the federal Common Rule agencies could go ahead with the NPRM proposals as published in the final rule.” Further, the government couldn't adopt a public comment that fills in gaps in the NPRM, even if that proposal was a “great, amazing scheme,” because that would fall outside of the scope of the proposed rule.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jeannie Baumann in Washington email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Randy Kubetin firstname.lastname@example.org
More information on the Health Care Compliance Association conference is available at http://www.hcca-info.org/Events/EventInfo.aspx?sessionaltcd=003_RC0616.
The proposed new Common Rule is available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/nprm-home/.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)