Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
Oct. 28 — Companies and investors still can't agree on where and how to report on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.
Most of the biggest companies in the U.S. now issue standalone sustainability reports. But few investors want to see ESG disclosures that way, according to a new survey from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Only about one-fifth of the small sample of institutional investors and pension funds surveyed said they wanted to see ESG information published separately, using a framework from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) that has dominated the sustainability disclosure landscape for more than a decade.
Those investors would rather see ESG data incorporated into financial filings using newly drafted industry-specific guidelines from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. Asset owners such as the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and asset managers such as BlackRock are starting to rally behind SASB's approach.
The problem is: none of the chief sustainability officers or other corporates in the survey use SASB—at least in part because its standards aren't yet finalized.
The San Francisco-based standards developer says many of the topics it has identified already appear in financial reporting, just in boilerplate language.
“The kinds of things that SASB’s addressing have long been known to be pain points for investors,” the group’s founder Jean Rogers told Bloomberg BNA. (SASB’s board is chaired by Michael Bloomberg, founder and majority owner of Bloomberg BNA's parent company, Bloomberg LP.)
One of those pain points is the comparability of data across companies. The majority of companies in the PwC survey thought their disclosures made comparisons easy. The majority of investors disagreed.
Another is quality. All of the companies surveyed were confident in the quality of the sustainability information they report. Less than 30 percent of investors saw it that way.
Investors said they would feel more confident in its quality if ESG data were certified or audited by a third party or if it were incorporated into filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, especially if a company’s executives signed off on the information.
“I think they intuitively would have more confidence in something that is put forth in an SEC filing than something that’s just put out on a website or in a glossy CSR [corporate social responsibility] report,” Sara DeSmith, who leads assurance at PwC's sustainable business group in the U.S., told Bloomberg BNA.
The commission recently asked for feedback on corporate reporting on climate change and other sustainability issues as part of a broader review of disclosures.
SASB isn’t the only way to get ESG information into financial reporting.
Companies could submit sustainability reports as an attachment, as the Amsterdam-based GRI has suggested to the SEC. They could also put together integrated reports that combine financial and the kind of “pre-financial” information that shows up in sustainability reports.
Eric Hespenheide, GRI's interim chief executive, says pre-financial reporting on topics like gender diversity and labor practices can act as an “early warning system” for issues that shareholders and other stakeholders should care about.
“You could make a case that, over time, anything left unaddressed could become financially material,” Hespenheide, a former partner at Deloitte LLP, told Bloomberg BNA.
GRI will be able to address emerging issues in a more timely fashion now that it is transitioning from issuing a new installment of guidelines every few years to updating individual topics on the fly.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Vittorio in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at email@example.com
The PwC survey results are available at https://www.pwc.com/us/en/governance-insights-center/publications/assets/investors-corporates-and-esg-bridging-the-gap.pdf
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)