Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
A West Virginia coal company learned the hard way that it’s not enough to do everything it was required to do under its Clean Water Act permit. It also has to ensure that the water into which it discharges meets water quality standards.
Fola Coal Co., a subsidiary of Consol Energy, found that out in January when a federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., ruled that it violated the Clean Water Act by not complying with “boilerplate language” in its discharge permit about meeting the underlying water quality standards.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit rejected Fola Coal’s arguments that a permit shield—provisions essentially saying that if a company meets all the requirements in its permit, then it is complying with the law—protected it from liability because it met the discharge limits in its Clean Water Act permit. The Fourth Circuit said the company didn’t comply with the conditions of the permit, which included making sure that the effluent limits didn’t cause a violation of the water quality standards ( Ohio Valley Envtl. Coal. v. Fola Coal Co. , 845 F.3d 133, 83 ERC 1885, 2017 BL 1114 (4th Cir. 2017)).
The permit shield, under Section 402(k) of the Clean Water Act, specifies that permit holders cannot face enforcement action for violating a requirement that is not spelled out in the permit.
The Fourth Circuit’s decision, which has been cited in other federal courts, has spurred lawyers for national groups representing municipal owned wastewater utilities and mining companies to warn their members about the potential pitfalls of ignoring boilerplate language.
Many National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits have descriptive language detailing requirements, as well as strict numeric limits, that prohibit discharges that can lead to violations of water quality standards, said Erica Spitzig, deputy general counsel for the National Association of Clean Water Water Agencies, at a American Law Institute-Continuing Legal Education seminar on Environmental Law.
With this ruling and related ones, Spitzig said, permit holders are vulnerable to “collateral attack.” She warned permit holders to be prepared for litigation based on the narrative water quality standards.
Moreover, Spitzig urged attorneys, particularly those representing facilities requiring water discharge permits, to read the permit language very carefully.
Spitzig’s message was echoed by Amanda Aspatore, associate general counsel for the National Mining Association, which includes Consol Energy among its members. Aspatore said the Fourth Circuit and related decisions are causing uncertainty among the permit holders because they thought they were shielded from liability as a result of meeting their discharge limits.
Neil McAliley, a shareholder attorney with the Miami office of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt P.A., said the Fourth Circuit ruling doesn’t represent a major shift in law related to Clean Water Act liability, but it does show how the environmental groups have “exploited” of the “catchall provision” in the discharge permit.
McAliley said he wouldn’t be surprised to find an increase in lawsuits rooted in this provision, but he said the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that the discharges do cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards.
“And that won’t be possible in every case,” he added.
He said permit seekers must seek very precise language in their discharge permits going forward to guard against liability.
Larry Levine, staff attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said Spitzig, Aspatore and other lawyers are making a “mountain out of a molehill.”
“This ruling reaffirms existing law,” Levine said. He said the companies have the premise wrong that a permit can be used as a defense to violate water quality standards.
“The language in the permit has meaning,” Levine said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Amena H. Saiyid in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
The Fourth Circuit decision is at http://src.bna.com/mJ3
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)