Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
April 25 — The four companies that own Constitution Pipeline Co. LLC may challenge New York's decision to deny a permit for the gas pipeline project, pledging April 25 to “pursue all available options” to fight the state decision.
The challenge may include an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Christopher L. Stockton, a spokesman for the company, told Bloomberg BNA in an e-mail.
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation denied a water quality certification permit for the project April 22, saying the project would have an adverse impact on some 251 streams and would disturb wetlands. It also said the project application was incomplete and failed to address a number of concerns (79 DEN A-14, 4/25/16).
The state decision is being viewed in the context of its 2015 ban on fracking of natural gas. Supporters of the pipeline said the decision was political, while environmental groups and opponents applauded it for helping to move the state away from its dependence on fossil fuels.
Constitution has a number of options if it wants to move forward with the project, including litigation. It may also re-submit an application or request a hearing with the DEC within 30 days to discuss the permit denial.
The 125-mile pipeline is being proposed by Williams Partners LP., Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Piedmont Natural Gas Co. and WGL Holdings Inc. It would connect natural gas production in northeastern Pennsylvania with northeastern markets, including the southern tier of New York.
The project, which received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in December 2014, needs a number of permits from New York, including water quality certification under the Clean Water Act.
DEC, in denying certification, said the project could have a “profound” impact, including “loss of available water body habitat, changes in thermal conditions, increased erosion and creation of stream instability and turbidity.”
It said, despite the fact that the application was updated numerous times, Constitution “has not supplied sufficient information for the Department to be reasonably assured that the State's water quality standards would be met during construction and operation of the proposed pipeline.”
“As a result, the Department cannot be assured that the aforementioned adverse impacts to water quality and associated resources will be avoided or adequately minimized and mitigated so as not to materially interfere with or jeopardize the best usages of affected water bodies,” DEC said.
Constitution vigorously refuted the state's reasons for denial in a statement, saying it worked closely with the state for three years and voluntarily agreed to the state's requests to incorporate re-routes, adopt trenchless construction methodologies and to conduct trout stream restoration. It also agreed to provide funding for $18 million in wetland mitigation.
“We believe NYSDEC’s stated rationale for the denial includes flagrant misstatements and inaccurate allegations, and appears to be driven more by New York State politics than by environmental science,” the project sponsors said in a joint statement. “We worked in good faith with the NYSDEC for years, so this decision comes as a surprise and is contrary to our dialogue and collaborative effort to address concerns.”
The state decision was applauded by environmentalists and opposed by the Business Council of New York State, the American Petroleum Institute and the Joint Landowners Coalition of New York, a group that supported fracking in the Southern Tier region of the state.
The coalition said the project would support 2,400 jobs, generate $130 million in income and provide $13 million in local tax revenue.
To contact the reporter on this story: Gerald B. Silverman in Albany, N.Y., at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)