Bloomberg Law’s® extensive network of reporters and editors helps subscribers to stay ahead of legal
By Lance J. Rogers
Jan. 7 — Drugs and guns seized during the execution of a valid search warrant needn't be suppressed just because some of the officers took advantage of the situation to steal an iPhone, a PlayStation and other items from the suspects' home, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled Jan. 5.
The ordinary remedy when officers seize items not listed in a warrant is suppression of the improperly seized items, not all the evidence, the court said in an opinion by Judge Stephanie K. Seymour.
Blanket suppression is only called for in those very rare cases where officers so flagrantly disregard the limitations of a warrant that they effectively turn the search into a fishing expedition, the court said.
The district court granted Ricky D. Webster's habeas petition on the ground that his lawyer was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress because members of an elite tactical team stole cash and several electronic devices from his home while they “secured” the residence prior to its search by the team of narcotics officers who had obtained the search warrant.
Counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Webster, the district court said, because a motion to suppress would have been granted under United States v. Medlin, which ordered blanket suppression of all the evidence seized—not just that which is illegally seized—when officers exhibited “flagrant disregard” for the warrant's terms by taking more than 660 items not named in the warrant.
The Tenth Circuit reversed, saying that Medlin was distinguishable. Medlin, it said, presented a unique situation because the officers used the warrant as a pretext to launch a “fishing expedition.” Their “wholesale seizure” converted the legitimate warrant into a “general warrant,” it said.
By contrast, it said, the officers in the Webster search didn't use the warrant as an excuse to seize everything in sight; they pocketed four distinct items.
Another critical difference between the search here and the fishing expedition in Medlin is the fact that the narcotics officers were not in league with the tactical team, the court said. The taint in Medlin was much greater because all the officers took part in the illegal search, it said.
It also distinguished Medlin on the ground that the officers located the items named in the warrant in the first hour of the search but continued to rummage through the premises for another six hours seizing “anything of value.”
The court rejected Webster's argument that application of the exclusionary rule would operate as a strong deterrent against this type of misconduct, noting that the rogue officers had been prosecuted and convicted.
“We cannot imagine any better deterrence than criminal prosecution,” it said.
Judges Paul J. Kelly Jr. and Scott M. Matheson Jr. joined the opinion.
Berkowitz Oliver Williams Shaw & Eisenbrandt LLP, Kansas City, Mo., represented Webster. The Department of Justice, Washington, represented the government.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lance J. Rogers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)