Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Stephen Lee
A district court decision stopping the expansion of a Montana coal mine provides a blueprint for environmental advocates to block other coal, oil, and gas projects across the country.
“The decision has national significance, and it can and will be applied in other cases that we are bringing to challenge the federal government’s analysis of coal development, oil and gas development, and other fossil fuel projects,” Laura King, staff attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center, told Bloomberg BNA.
Especially vulnerable could be two Bureau of Land Management decisions, King said. One, issued in 2015, made more than 80 billion tons of coal and nearly 10 million acres of land available for federal oil and gas leasing in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin. The second approved 147,000 acres for oil and gas leasing in Colorado.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Montana found Aug. 14 that the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement didn’t fully consider the impacts of Signal Peak Energy’s proposed expansion of Bull Mountain Mine in Montana ( Mont. Envtl. Info. Ctr. v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining , 2017 BL 283856, D. Mont., No. CV 15-106-M-DWM, 8/14/17 ).
The court ruled OSMRE violated the National Environmental Policy Act by focusing on the benefits of the mine plan while minimizing the environmental and social impacts of trains transporting coal to ports in Canada and on the Great Lakes, as well as the air pollution emissions of coal combustion.
Had it been approved, Signal Peak’s mine would have been the biggest underground coal mine in the country, based on production, according to the Sierra Club.
Hayden Baker, an attorney with Sullivan & Worcester LLP, told Bloomberg BNA that the decision “really shows how courts—and, by extension, nongovernmental organizations and states—can continue to use the other mechanisms at their disposal to slow down infrastructure in mining.”
Rena Steinzor, an administrative law professor at the University of Maryland, said the decision shows how government is supposed to work.
“That use of the separation of powers is an absolute model,” Steinzor told Bloomberg BNA. “There are three branches, and they are all supposed to provide checks and balances on each other. And [Judge Donald] Molloy checked and he balanced. The courts are particularly important in interpreting statutes, because otherwise we just have the agencies themselves doing it. “
But attorney Baker also cautioned that one impediment to environmentalists using the strategy again is that each case is different and highly contingent on specific sets of facts.
“What’s more important is that they scored a win here and will therefore push their strategy further,” he said. “Any case will be dependent on how good a job the agency or proponent did in justifying their National Environmental Policy Act Review. So yes, while opponents will push forward with this strategy, it’s hard to gauge the precedential value this has because it’s always so fact-specific.”
Mike Dawson, a spokesman for Signal Peak Energy, told Bloomberg BNA that the company will be “evaluating all of our options” in the coming weeks and months.For now, the mine remains open, and no workers have been laid off, Dawson said.
“Depending on a number of factors, this court decision could affect some operations in the future,” Dawson said.
Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, told Bloomberg BNA that, “aside from the absence of any legal obligation to consider these wider costs, there is no actionable, reliable value in doing so.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Stephen Lee in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachael Daigle at email@example.com
The U.S. District Court for the District of Montana mine decision can be found at http://src.bna.com/rJz
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)