Employee Benefits News examines legal developments that impact the employee benefits and executive compensation employers provide, including federal and state legislation, rules from federal...
Jan. 5 — A chiropractor isn't required to arbitrate his claims that Aetna Inc. violated federal benefits law by denying payment for covered procedures as recoupment for earlier overpayments, a federal judge in New Jersey has ruled.
In a Dec. 31 unpublished opinion, Judge Michael A. Shipp of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey reconsidered his earlier ruling compelling arbitration in the case, relying on intervening precedent from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in CardioNet, Inc. v. CIGNA Health Corp., 751 F.3d 165, 58 EBC 1001 (3d Cir. 2014), which ruled that derivative claims for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act obtained through valid assignments from patients weren't subject to an arbitration agreement between the health-care providers and the insurer.
The case is one of several questioning prepayment review procedures of insurers that have withheld payment for covered procedures to cover alleged overages previously paid to the same providers, with two others also proceeding in the District of New Jersey (Tri3 Enters., LLC v. Aetna, Inc., D.N.J., No. 3:11-cv-03921-MAS-TJB, complaint filed, 7/8/11 and Premier Health Ctr., P.C. v. UnitedHealth Grp., D.N.J., No. 2:11-cv-00425-ES-JAD, complaint filed, 1/24/11).
In the instant case, groups of chiropractors have challenged Aetna's use of a prepayment review procedure, claiming that the insurer has violated ERISA by withholding payment for ostensibly covered services as a method of recouping benefits that it claimed were paid for earlier uncovered services.
In an unpublished June 2011 opinion, the court had previously granted a motion by Aetna to compel arbitration of derivative claims brought by an individual chiropractor, Dr. Peter Manz, pursuant to valid assignments that he had obtained from his patients, finding that the claims were subject to an arbitration agreement entered into between Manz and Aetna.
In May 2012, while Manz's claims were proceeding in arbitration, the court stayed the remaining issues in the instant case, pending resolution of the Tri3 case, which was before the Third Circuit after the district court had dismissed claims that Aetna's efforts to seek repayment for miscoded amounts violated ERISA.
In August 2013, the Third Circuit issued an unpublished decision vacating the district court's opinion and remanding the Tri3 case to the district court.
Shortly thereafter, in December 2013, the court reopened the instant case pursuant to a stipulation and consent order between the parties.
The reopened case didn't include Manz's claims, which were still progressing through the court-ordered arbitration process.
On May 6, the Third Circuit issued its precedential decision in the CardioNet case, finding that assigned claims for benefits under ERISA didn't fall within the arbitration clause of a provider agreement between the insurer and the provider.
According to the court in the instant case, the Third Circuit's opinion in CardioNet changed the law within the appellate circuit and established that a health-care provider with a properly assigned claim for ERISA benefits from his patient couldn't be required to arbitrate that claim if the patient herself couldn't be compelled to arbitrate the claim.
Finding that the situation in the instant case was “factually indistinguishable” from CardioNet, the court granted the motion to reconsider and vacated its prior order to compel Manz's claims to arbitration.
Manz was represented by Zuckerman Spaeder LLP; Buttaci & Leardi LLC; Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello PC; and Axelrod & Dean LLP.
Aetna was represented by Connell Foley LLP.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)