Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
By Alex Ebert
CVS might need some Tylenol to soothe its property tax headache in Bloomington, Ind. where the Indiana Tax Court won’t prescribe a discount the retailer sought for a pharmacy’s valuation.
On Sept. 29, the Indiana Tax Court upheld lower decisions regarding the valuation of a 12,799-square-foot pharmacy for tax years 2011, 2012, and 2013, finding largely for Monroe County. CVS argued the store should be valued around its market rental price, between $1.81 and $1.94 million in those three years. But the court said the Board of Tax Review’s decision to use the store’s cash values between $2.35 and $2.48 million was reasonable ( CVS Corp. v. Monroe County Assessor , Ind. T.C., No. 49T10-1607-TA-00020, 9/29/17 ).
CVS claimed that the lower opinions were arbitrary and capricious—the legal standard for overturning an administrative court decision—because they didn’t rely on CVS’ lower-value “income approach,” which had won the pharmacy giant two property tax reductions in the last year. But Judge Martha Blood Wentworth, the Indiana Tax Court’s single judge, found CVS’ valuation approach “did not explain how the national and regional data it used related to the subject property,” and that previous administrative decisions don’t bind administrative decisions in different tax years and on different properties.
Wentworth wrote that the county’s cash valuation was more reasonable because there was little evidence that the Bloomington CVS should be valued less than the two other stores in the region. Although the court held that some parts of CVS’ land evaluation were more reliable than the county’s, Wentworth said the court wouldn’t reweigh evidence on appeal.
CVS was more successful in previous cases before the Indiana Tax Court challenging the valuations of its two previous Bloomington stores.
In May, the Indiana Tax Court upheld lower determinations that reduced a different Bloomington CVS store’s valuation from between $2.98 and $3.05 million in tax years 2007 through 2013 to between $1.85 and $2.24 million in the same period. CVS also won a similar victory in November 2016 for a different property, knocking more than $1 million off its valuation for years 2009 through 2013.
In both of those cases, administrative determinations found that the city was either improperly judging the value of the Bloomington stores based on valuations of only open stores, or that a CVS preferred income approach to valuation was best for those properties.
CVS was hoping these victories would carry over to its third store, and it argued that the Board of Tax Review should have taken “judicial notice” of these previous victories to consider favorable opinions of its income approach as recognized fact.
However, Wentworth said that while the board “may” take notice of prior rulings, it doesn’t have to and isn’t required to rely on those previous rulings.
“The Tax Court has long-held that ‘each assessment and each tax year stands alone,’ and the Indiana Board evaluates each property’s value based on its specific facts and circumstances,” Wentworth wrote. “Thus, ‘the Indiana Board is not bound to reach the same conclusions regarding the persuasive value of an appraiser’s reports and valuation methods for different tax years or different properties.’”
CVS’ lawyer Paul Jones, of Indianapolis-based Paul Jones Law, LLC, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. The Monroe County Legal Department and the Indiana Attorney General also didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Ebert in Columbus, Ohio at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jennifer McLoughlin at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the opinion is at http://src.bna.com/s2v.
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)