Trust Bloomberg Tax for the international news and analysis to navigate the complex tax treaty networks and global business regulations.
By Karin Jensen
A district court will decide Aug. 23 whether the Danish Tax Authority (SKAT) will be allowed to use phone tappings as evidence against a Danish expatriate charged with gross tax fraud to the tune of 50 million kroner ($7.9 million).
The tappings were obtained by police during an investigation, that lasted more than five years, relating to possible tax avoidance by a Danish national.
SKAT reported the Dane to the police in 2006, on suspicion that he lived in Denmark while claiming to live abroad. The Danish police obtained a court order to tap the Dane, whose spouse and children live in Denmark. Poul Gade, a senior lawyer at Bech-Bruun—the firm representing the Danish expatriate—told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 15 that a thorough investigation into their client began after that. It included scrutiny of tax information as well as phone tappings and mobile phone tracking.
The Danish expatriate was arrested and charged with tax fraud after about six months of investigation, but police finally dropped the case after a further five years of looking into the matter.
However, SKAT decided to take the case to the National Tax Tribunal, reclaiming more than 50 million kroner from the accused during the period 1996-2006.
“The case at the National Tax Tribunal will depend on the ruling in the District Court,” Gade said.
He added that the tribunal will deliver a ruling “sometime this autumn” on whether the accused is taxable in Denmark and if so, “how much the accused will have to repay.”
SKAT’s use of the police’s tappings in the case violates the law, Gade said. Furthermore, included in the tappings are police tappings of phone conversations between the client and his lawyer, which is illegal according to Danish law, Gade said.
“The Administration of Justice Act says that if the police close a case, all tapping material has to be destroyed. But SKAT has kept the material. It’s perfectly normal that SKAT and the police exchange material during a joint investigation, but the question is what happens once the police close a case. Can SKAT keep the material or should the material be retained? Because the police are subject to the Administration of Justice Act, we believe the material should be destroyed,” Gade said.
There is no legal practice in this area so the district court case is a principle case. The key question, which will form precedent in other future cases, is whether SKAT is allowed to actively use material that was either illegal when the police obtained it or should have been destroyed when the police ended their investigation without charging the Danish expatriate with a crime, a partner at Bech-Bruun told Bloomberg BNA.
“The first is obviously the worst. But the second category is bad enough because we’re talking written summaries of telephone tappings, where the actual tapes have been destroyed by the police,” said the partner, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Because the tapes no longer exist, it is impossible to verify whether the summaries provide a complete picture of what was said in the phone calls, which means the accused is prevented from producing counterclaims, which is an important legal principle, the Bech-Bruun partner said.
“The core of the case is whether SKAT should be allowed further scope to obtain and keep evidence that the police have,” the partner said.
SKAT can’t comment on specific citizens or companies due to duty of confidentiality, a spokesperson told Bloomberg BNA.
However, in a written statement sent to Bloomberg BNA, SKAT said in general terms it can state that—for the sake of the best possible enlightenment of the case as well as the consideration to obtain the materially right decision—evidence obtained by the police and subsequently disclosed legally to SKAT can be used in a tax case even though the police subsequently had to destroy the material.
The tax assessments made by SKAT in tax cases are regulated by inquisitorial procedure as well as rules laid down by the Tax Administration Act, the Tax Control Act, and the Danish Civil Protection Act. This means that the special rules within criminal justice under the Administration of Justice Act therefore don’t apply to SKAT’s handling of tax cases, SKAT said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Karin Jensen in Copenhagen at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Penny Sukhraj at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)