Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
May 27 --Federal appellate judges May 27 upheld the Environmental Protection Agency decision to retain the existing air quality standards for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the agency was acting within its statutory authority when it chose not to revise the secondary national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide due to scientific uncertainty about what level of protection was necessary to safeguard the environment.
“Petitioners dispute EPA's conclusion that it lacked sufficient scientific information to make a reasoned judgment, and they argue that, even if EPA was correct, it failed to provide an adequate explanation on that score,” Senior Circuit Judge A. Raymond Randolph said in the opinion. “Decades of decisions in this court stand in the way of these arguments.”
An attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, which had challenged the rule, could not be reached for comment.
The EPA has acknowledged the existing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide standards are insufficient to protect the environment, but the agency chose not to revise them in 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 20,218). The agency developed a revised standard to protect the environment from the effects of acid deposition based on maintaining an acid-neutralizing capacity in the environment, but it said further study was needed. Meanwhile, the EPA retained the existing secondary standard for nitrogen dioxide of 0.053 part per million, averaged annually, and the existing standard for sulfur dioxide of 0.5 ppm, averaged over three hours and not to be exceeded more than once annually.
The Center for Biological Diversity, the Clean Air Council and the National Parks Conservation Association sued the EPA, arguing that the Clean Air Act compels the agency to set more protective standards even in the face of scientific uncertainty.
The court dismissed that argument, saying it must defer to the agency's expertise on scientific matters.
“If, as EPA found, the available information was insufficient to permit a reasoned judgment about whether any proposed standard would be 'requisite to protect the public welfare,' promulgating that standard would have been arbitrary and capricious,” Randolph said.
This decision is the latest in a string of wins for the agency as the court has repeatedly deferred to the EPA's expert judgment.
In April, the D.C. Circuit upheld the EPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for power plants, which are among the costliest regulations the agency has promulgated (White Stallion Energy Center LLC v. EPA, 2014 BL 103957, D.C. Cir., No. 12-1100, 4/15/14).
The court also upheld the EPA's revised air toxics standards for cement kilns (NRDC v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 10-1371, 4/18/14).
In addition, the D.C. Circuit found the EPA acted reasonably in retaining primary, health-based national ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide that were first set in 1971 (Communities for a Better Env't v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 11-1423, 4/11/14).
In May, the appeals court upheld the EPA decision to tighten air quality standards for fine particulate matter (Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 13-1069, 5/9/14).
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Childers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
The opinion in Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. EPA is available at http://tinyurl.com/ov6cjg6.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)