Securities Law Daily provides daily coverage of developments in the regulation of federal, state, and international securities and futures trading, with objective coverage of the...
Feb. 22 — Companies are scrambling to amend corporate provisions in the wake of a Delaware Chancery Court ruling that directors in companies without classified boards may be removed without cause, despite what their charters or bylaws say.
As of Feb. 23, at least 25 companies have said they either plan to adopt amendments to comply with the Dec. 21 bench ruling or have already done so.
Attorneys told Bloomberg BNA that the opinion will spur more amendments and may even give some entities additional reason to choose another corporate structure.
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, ruling in In re Vaalco Energy Shareholder Litigation, said that approximately 175 Delaware companies with non-classified boards have charter or bylaw provisions that allow removal of directors “only for cause.”Such provisions are invalid as a matter of Delaware law, Laster ruled.
In the Vaalco lawsuit, investors claimed that under Delaware General Corporation Law Section 141(k), a majority of stockholders have a right to vote to remove directors without cause unless the corporation has a classified board or cumulative voting.
Gardner Davis, partner and corporate lawyer in the Jacksonville, Fla., office of Foley & Lardner LLP, told Bloomberg BNA in a Feb. 23 interview that the provisions at issue probably are inadvertent leftovers from when these companies had classified boards.
“In my opinion, this is just ‘corporate cleanup,'” Davis said.
Bruce Toth, a partner in Chicago-based Winston & Strawn LLP's corporate department, said companies should get rid of such language to comply with Vaalco.
“In light of the decision, you have little recourse but to amend or make a public statement that you're not going to enforce it, although I would certainly advise you to amend it,” Toth, author of Bloomberg BNA's The Board of Directors portfolio, said in an interview Feb. 23.
Although Laster issued his opinion from the bench, the ruling should be treated with the same weight as a full, written decision, and companies probably should react sooner rather than later, Toth added.
Quick reaction to Laster's opinion can make the difference when defending against a shareholder lawsuit, Toth continued. “You're going to get inquiries from the plaintiffs' bar,” he said.
Shareholders of at least two companies, Erin Energy Corp. and Mueller Industries Inc., have filed suit this year in the chancery court over “only for cause” provisions. The Mueller suit was voluntarily dismissed Jan. 25 after its board amended its provision Jan. 15.
Companies that are further along in the process will have a better defense that they have already initiated action, which can minimize or eliminate costs from such inquiries, Toth said.
Some observers suggest that the ruling may make Delaware less business-friendly.
The opinion is another move by the court away from the precept of “freedom to contract,” Debbie Hoffman, in-house chief legal officer at Digital Risk LLC and head of the company's compliance and governance duties, told Bloomberg BNA in an interview Feb. 23.
The precept is one that has “set Delaware apart as a jurisdiction with the broadest grant of power to set the terms of a company's governance,” she said.
The opinion adds a “mandatory provision into governance documents” that will not apply to limited liability companies or limited partnerships, which may grow in favor among businesses as a result of such decisions, she said.
The Vaalco opinion presents an interesting question for companies about whether to opt in to the “for cause” removal limitation, Davis said.
Companies could decide to adopt cumulative voting, but that would enable dissident shareholders an easier way to obtain board representation, Davis said. They also could adopt a classified board, which would be “going against the trend,” he added.
Another option may be to “adopt charter provisions requiring a supermajority shareholder vote to remove directors, which would almost certainly draw opposition from the proxy advisory firms,” he said.
All of those options are not likely, Davis added.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Yin Wilczek at firstname.lastname@example.org
|PetroQuest Energy Inc.||Energy||Lafayette, La.||Board amended bylaws Feb. 19 to comply.|
|Peabody Energy Corp.||Energy||St. Louis, Mo.||Company said Feb. 18 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc.||Pharmaceuticals||New York||Board amended bylaws Feb. 10 to comply.|
|Medidata Solutions Inc.||Computers||New York||Board amended bylaws Feb. 11 to comply.|
|Inteliquent Inc.||Communications||Chicago, Ill.||Board decided Feb. 9 to put before stockholders a charter amendment at next annual meeting.|
|Quantum Corp.||Computers||San Jose, Calif.||Board amended bylaws Feb. 3 to comply.|
|AtriCure Inc.||Health Care||West Chester, Ohio||Board amended bylaws Feb. 3 to comply.|
|Support.com Inc.||Computer||Redwood City, Calif.||Board amended bylaws Feb. 5 to comply.|
|Alliance Data Systems Corp.||Financial Services||Plano, Texas||Company said Jan. 26 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|NorthWestern Corp.||Energy||Sioux Falls, S.D.||Company said Jan. 29 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|Sequenom Inc.||Biotechnology||San Diego, Calif.||Company said Jan. 26 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|Vringo Inc.||Communications||New York||Board amended bylaws Jan. 26 to comply.|
|Lifetime Brands Inc.||Consumer Goods||Garden City, N.Y.||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 26 to comply with the opinion.|
|Mueller Industries Inc.||Materials||Memphis, Tenn.||Board amended bylaws Jan. 15 to comply.|
|Amphenol Corp.||Electronics||Wallingford, Conn.||Company said Jan. 14 it will not enforce its provision and the board adopted a resolution on amending the charter to put before stockholders at next annual meeting.|
|NRG Yield Inc.||Energy||Princeton, N.J.||Company said Jan. 26 it will not enforce its provision and the board adopted a resolution on amending the charter to put before stockholders at next annual meeting.|
|Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc.||Beverages||Plano, Texas||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 23 to comply with the opinion.|
|Equinix Inc.||Real Estate||Redwood City, Calif.||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 13 to comply with the opinion.|
|Pzena Investment Management Inc.||Financial Services||New York||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 15 to comply with the opinion.|
|Innoviva Inc.||Pharmaceuticals||San Francisco, Calif.||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 15 to comply with the opinion.|
|Comfort Systems USA Inc.||Construction||Houston||Company said Jan. 15 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|Tessera Technologies Inc.||Semiconductors||San Jose, Calif.||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 9 to comply with the opinion.|
|Vitamin Shoppe Inc.||Retail||Secaucus, N.J.||Board amended its bylaws Jan. 11 to comply with the opinion.|
|Regulus Therapeutics Inc.||Pharmaceutical||Carlsbad, Calif.||Company said Jan. 8 it will not enforce its provision and will seek to amend its charter at its annual meeting.|
|Vaalco Energy Inc.||Energy||Houston||Board amended its bylaws Dec. 23 to comply with the opinion.|
|Source: Bloomberg Law: Corporate Transactions|
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)