Stay current on changes and developments in corporate law with a wide variety of resources and tools.
By Michael Greene
Feb. 11 — The Delaware Chancery Court Feb. 10 stayed a breach of fiduciary claim against one set of defendants pending arbitration and dismissed the fiduciary claim against another set of defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The plaintiffs, minority unitholders of four limited partnerships, alleged that they received insufficient merger consideration in a freeze-out transaction.
In staying the claims against one set of defendants, Vice Chancellor Donald F. Parsons Jr. determined that the parties had agreed that an arbitrator would decide whether it has jurisdiction over the claim.
Vice Chancellor Parsons also granted a separate motion to dismiss by a second set of defendants, finding unpersuasive the plaintiffs' argument that the defendants owed a fiduciary duty because they exercised control over the limited partnership.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (“AimCo”), a publicly traded Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust, announced that four limited partnerships would merger into Aimco Properties, L.P. (“Aimco OP”), a subsidiary of an Aimco affiliate.
Aimco indirectly held a majority of the limited partnership units and several of its subsidiaries were general partners of the limited partnerships.
The plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of minority unitholders of the LPs alleging fiduciary duty breaches because the merger was not entirely fair in terms of price or process.
Several of the general partner defendants moved to dismiss claims against them for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the relevant partnership agreement contained broad, mandatory arbitration clauses.
Echoing a recent opinion, Vice Chancellor Parsons noted that the question of substantive arbitrability—whether the parties agreed to arbitrate—is generally decided by the courts.
However, he added that under the Delaware Supreme Court’s holding in James & Jackson, LLC v. Willie Gary, if the parties agree to allow the arbitrator to determine the issue of substantive arbitrability, “the courts should defer to that manifestation of intent.”
“Here, the Arbitration Clauses provide for the widest array of potential claims—that is, ‘[a]ny dispute or controversy arising under, or out of, or in connection with or in relation to this Agreement …,’” he wrote.
Moreover, the parties also agreed that the arbitration would be conducted in accordance with American Arbitration Association rules, which state that the arbitrator has to power to determine its jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the court stayed the complaint against these defendants because the arbitration clause at issue was broadly written so that it “clearly and unmistakably” suggested that the parties agreed, as a threshold matter, that arbitrability would be decide by the arbitrator.
The court additionally granted Aimco OP’s and one of Aimco’s officers separate motions to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff failed to bring a reasonably conceivable breach of fiduciary claim against them.
In doing so, Vice Chancellor Parsons rejected the plaintiffs’ attempt to equate the status of the defendants to that of a controlling stockholder in the corporate context—an issue the court has tackled in myriad recent cases.
He found this argument to be “unpersuasive because of the differences between corporations and limited partnerships.”
Instead, he found that any conceivable fiduciary duty the defendants could owe would be found in the limited partnership agreements and Delaware’s Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act.
Because the plaintiff pled no allegations that subjected the defendants to liability on these grounds, he determined that no fiduciary duty was owed.
He additionally found that even if he applied his earlier corporate controller ruling—In re Crimson Exploration Inc. Stockholder Litigation—the plaintiff failed to plead facts that showed the defendants controlled the limited partnerships with respect to the merger.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Greene in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan Tuck at email@example.com
The opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/ROBERT_LEWIS_and_ANDREW_FRIEDMAN_individually_and_on_behalf_of_al.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)